Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately, the debate over whether secondary markets should collect royalties has been heated. Honestly, everyone just wants to reap liquidity dividends but doesn't want to pay an extra cent. The creator economy is often praised nicely, but when it comes to trading, it turns into: whoever can pay less in friction costs wins. From my perspective as someone who has been an LP, royalties are like an invisible fee rate added to your pool. Short-term transactions might look better? Maybe, but who will ultimately keep paying for the content... Anyway, it's not the group that claims to support it the most.
Why did I get the itch to place a few orders? It's simple—seeing a market with "royalty-free + volume boost," my brain automatically fills in "this liquidity is coming back, I can sell first," similar to testing network points or minting tokens on the mainnet: even if uncertain, I want to take a spot, just afraid of missing out. Later, I realized it was pretty stupid—creators aren't philanthropists, and traders definitely aren't either. First, clarify the rules clearly; don’t pretend to support co-creation while acting like you don’t see the costs. I’d rather participate less in this kind of game.