Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately, I've been looking at the IBC / cross-chain setup again, and the more I look, the more I feel that a single "cross over" is actually just pressing confirm on a series of things: the source chain must not rollback itself, the proof sent out must be reliable; the relayer/message passing layer must not be lazy or malicious; the target chain's light client/verification logic must be correct; plus, the multi-signature/oracle/escrow of the bridge (some even have an extra layer), and trust is laid bare... To put it simply, it's not as simple as clicking a button. I'm also reviewing the comparison between RWA and US Treasury yields versus on-chain yield products, and the more I compare, the more I want to ask: is this yield really from "the asset itself" or from "bridge + contract + operation"? My own definition of "long-term" is probably about a quarter; I don't expect results every day. First, I want to understand the trust chain clearly, and then I can wait patiently.