Talking with an old crypto hand, he asked me what I think about the SIGN project.

I said don't rush to ask "Can it make money," "Does it have a big team," "Is it listed on major exchanges," these questions are too shallow.

What should you really look at? Whether it has a genuine business model.
SIGN is different; EthSign and TokenTable together can generate $15 million in revenue in a year.
In the crypto world, that's a miracle level; most projects don't even have a decent revenue source, they survive solely by rug pulls.
SIGN first develops the product, gets the revenue flowing, then issues tokens.
That’s the correct order.

Even more impressive is its collaborations with the UAE, Sierra Leone, and Kyrgyzstan, using SIGN’s technology for digital identity and CBDC projects.
This isn’t something a fly-by-night project can boast about.

Some worry that token unlocks will cause a dump; I see no need for that.
The unlocked amount is small and can’t really dump the price.
The real risk is that retail investors don’t understand concepts like "sovereign narrative."
They don’t understand, so they get scared, sell off, and keep causing volatility.

Right now, SIGN’s market cap is around $75 million.
A project with national-level collaborations, real revenue, and practical products—this valuation is like the market is dumping gold.
But the problem is, when everyone is dumping, no one dares to buy.
By the time everyone understands, the price will have already skyrocketed.

Recently, the price has been fluctuating around $80.
From a long-term perspective, this level is worth paying attention to.
But how to operate specifically—that’s up to you.
I just lay out the logic clearly; the rest is for you to figure out.