Why do more and more brands feel that investing in KOLs is ineffective?


It's not because the budget has decreased, but because data is starting to distort.
Buying followers and interactions is essentially an incentive problem; when the market pays for exposure rather than conversions, fake data becomes profitable.
The impact of this is systemic: brands can't see real results, creator pricing systems are disrupted, users gradually lose trust in content, and those most affected are the long-term content creators who work diligently.
They don't inflate data but compete in the same market, and the end result is that genuine value is undervalued while false data is amplified.
Recently, I’ve been paying attention to @Magverse_AI; their approach is not about optimization but reconstruction.
Magverse_AI uses several key mechanisms: a KOL certification system to filter out low-quality accounts, bot detection and anti-cheating measures, pay-for-performance instead of pay-for-exposure, and all settlement data is transparent on the blockchain.
Together, these essentially do one thing: make authenticity the only standard again.
If this model works, the KOL economy will shift from traffic competition to value competition.
This is not a minor optimization but a change in direction.
If you’re also creating content or collaborating with brands, I suggest you understand this mechanism yourself:
Some trends are already too late by the time you understand them.
#onchain #aiagents
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin