Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
So, there's something happening in the U.S. Senate worth paying attention to. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was very direct in a hearing this week: he said there's a group of people in the crypto industry who are basically nihilists, preferring no regulation at all over well-crafted regulation.
Here's the scenario — there's a bill called the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act under discussion there, and apparently some major players are creating friction in the talks. Senator Mark Warner, one of the main Democrats pushing this agenda, literally said he feels like he's in crypto hell. He's trying to balance innovation with national security, especially when it comes to DeFi and stablecoins.
What's interesting is that Bessent was very clear: either the industry accepts smart, balanced regulation, or it needs to find another place to operate. He mentioned that it's impossible to move forward in the U.S. without this bill. Kind of a veiled ultimatum.
Now, there's a geopolitical detail that also came up in the same hearing. Bessent was asked about China potentially developing its own digital asset systems that could rival American financial leadership. He said there are rumors about Chinese digital assets that might be backed by gold or something beyond the yuan. It seems that concern over Chinese competition is very present in U.S. crypto policy discussions.
What does this mean? Basically, there's now dual pressure — internal, with industry resisting certain provisions, and external, with China potentially developing alternatives. This probably speeds up the legislative process. Senator Angela Alsobrooks already said she's optimistic about a bipartisan deal later this year.
Worth keeping an eye on how this unfolds. If this bill gets through, it will significantly change how the industry operates in the U.S. And considering the Chinese issue on the table, I bet it will happen.