Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
So there's this growing push in Congress to crack down on prediction market insider trading, and it's actually pretty interesting from a market perspective. Multiple Democrats are now introducing legislation to block government officials from betting on events they already know the outcome of—basically trying to prevent people with inside knowledge from gaming markets on military actions, war, terrorism, and similar sensitive operations.
The main bill getting attention is the BETS OFF Act, backed by Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut. He's been pretty vocal about this after reports surfaced that prediction market accounts had placed significant bets right before U.S. operations in Venezuela and Iran. The legislation would essentially ban any wagers where the bettor has advance knowledge of the outcome. It's not just limited to government stuff either—the bill would also cover things like who wins awards or surprise performers at major events, basically anything where insiders know the answer beforehand.
What's notable is this isn't a one-off effort. Representative Ritchie Torres introduced similar legislation back in January, and just recently Senator Adam Schiff and Senator Richard Blumenthal each introduced their own versions targeting different angles of the same problem. The fact that multiple lawmakers from the same party are pushing this suggests there's real concern about market integrity here.
Now here's where it gets interesting for the crypto space. The CFTC handles regulation of these prediction markets, and the current chairman Mike Selig is actually pretty pro-prediction markets—he sees them as potentially better than traditional polling. But even with that stance, there have been some internal disciplinary actions. Kalshi, one of the major platforms, recently suspended and fined users including a political candidate who'd bet on his own election knowing the outcome.
The Republican-controlled Congress probably won't prioritize Democratic legislation right now, but if the political winds shift in the midterms like those same prediction markets are suggesting, Chris Murphy and his colleagues could have more leverage to push this through. Either way, it signals that prediction markets are getting serious regulatory attention, and the insider trading angle is becoming harder to ignore. Interesting to watch how this develops.