Lately, I've been looking at a bunch of "tags/clusters/funding flow" panels, and everyone has started to profile addresses: whose wallet is this, which one is a market maker, which one is smart money... Honestly, they can be referenced, but don't take them too seriously. Many clusters are just pieced together based on transfer relationships, and when it comes to middlemen, exchange hot wallets, or fractional wallets, the "family tree" they draw can easily be misleading.



How much can you trust it?
I think only the general direction, don’t trust it enough to place orders.

Airdrop season is even more ridiculous; task platforms ramp up anti-witch measures, and the points system makes the grifting crowd feel like working a regular job. Addresses become more fragmented and convoluted, and profiling becomes more like guessing riddles. My own approach is very simple: for suspicious authorizations or interactions with unfamiliar contracts, I withdraw first; split funds into two or three wallets for isolation; if I do follow the "funding flow," I only treat it as an emotional indicator... Anyway, just to stay safe.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin