Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
XRP's recent trend reminds me of the situation back in 2022.
Looking at on-chain data, the current market structure is very similar—new buyers are making money, while those long-term retail investors who entered six months to a year ago are still at a loss.
This kind of divergence is quite dangerous because once the price stalls, long-term holders are likely to be forced to cut their losses.
According to some on-chain analysis data, XRP repeatedly tests the $2 level, each time accompanied by hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.
Obviously, many people here are not looking to add to their positions but are trying to find opportunities to cut losses.
Going back to 2022, XRP also experienced a similar imbalance in holdings around $0.78, followed by several months of continuous decline, with the price dropping to around $0.30.
The current situation is that XRP is trapped at this psychological barrier of $2, with new traders floating profits and veteran traders waiting to exit.
As long as the price doesn’t continue to rise, this pressure will only grow stronger.
Based on mid-2025 data, every time the price approaches $2, there are weekly losses of $500 million to $1.2 billion, indicating that holders' mentality has shifted from greed to seeking stability.
This doesn’t necessarily mean a repeat of the 2022 crash, but the longer this divergence in buying costs persists, the greater the pressure on those who entered at higher levels.