Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
On my commute, I overheard a bunch of people talking about "modularization." Basically, as a end-user, my perception most of the time is: signing in my wallet still takes a few clicks, Gas fees still hurt, and sometimes the chain gets congested and everything gets stuck... What exactly has really changed? Maybe it's just that the settlement/data layer behind the scenes has been swapped out, and the experience becomes "the same app is faster today, slower tomorrow," and then the team has to issue announcements explaining it.
Recently, before and after the upgrade/maintenance of that mainstream public chain, everyone is guessing whether the project should migrate. I see it more as governance drama: who can get subsidies, who can spin a new narrative to continue fundraising. Modularization indeed makes "moving" sound less scary, but ultimately users only care about not having to cross three-layer bridges or wake up to find their assets on the wrong chain... Anyway, voting can't improve the experience; only code and profit sharing can.