Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
People in the group are again sharing that chart about "a certain stablecoin losing its peg," and as soon as emotions rise, everyone only focuses on one sentence... I now tend to look at more boring things: GitHub, audit reports, and whether the upgrade permissions are multi-signed.
If a newbie wants to judge "credibility," I think it's better not to pursue understanding the code first. Check if GitHub updates are normal, if someone reviews the changes, if there are bug reports in the issues that are actually fixed; for those that haven't moved in months and suddenly have a bunch of major changes without explanation, I’d stay away. Don’t just look at the cover and "audited" label on audit reports; focus on whether there are "unresolved/partially resolved" risk items and if there are subsequent public fix records matching. Upgrading multi-signature permissions is more straightforward: how many people sign, who they are, whether there's a timelock (giving you reaction time). If it’s still "single key upgrade with one click," honestly, it’s like putting the money in someone else’s pocket.
Anyway, I do LP to sleep well, prefer to earn a little less, rather than make decisions based on panic/excitement from sharing. That’s all for now.