Recently, I’ve been a bit exhausted from DAO voting… Proposals are written to be “for the community,” but my first instinct now is to look at how incentives are distributed, who can receive them, and whether receiving them might backfire and hijack the next round of voting. To be honest, many discussions aren’t about functionality; they’re about redistributing power: voting thresholds, delegate lists, emergency permissions given to whom. These are much more important than the wording.

Outside, Layer 2 is still arguing over TPS, fees, and ecosystem subsidies—who’s more aggressive. I care more about who actually receives the subsidies and whether it will eventually turn into “those who get the subsidies decide the rules.” It’s okay to take it slow; proposals with clear permissions, audited, and capable of being stopped if something goes wrong are what I dare to support. I’ve been educated once already—being cautious isn’t cool, but at least I can sleep peacefully.