Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
I just watched a video where some well-known analysts ( I won't name ) compared different points in Bitcoin's history with recent Bitcoin market conditions.
The tools he used, I believe, are illusionary, such as low-high points, RSI, and some other indicators that actually don't work.
He also relies on his pattern recognition ability, which I find highly subjective.
Can we compare previous cycle points using mathematical and scientific methods? Yes, here is the approach.
This differs slightly from previous charts because it uses a 3-month moving average (MA) compared to a 1-year period, but the results are similar.
Feature (3-month MA):
All 92 points are below the power law (undervaluation)
n range: [-27.81, 1.84] — wide distribution of local growth rates
dn/dt range: [0.032, 0.052] — all positive, trending toward stability/bottom
Average: n = -5.07 ± 7.14, dn/dt = 0.042 ± 0.006
What does this tell us:
These yellow squares represent Bitcoin's historical “accumulation zones”:
Declining but stabilizing — negative n (price drops on a 3-month scale), but dn/dt is positive (slowing down the rate of decline)
Classic bottom pattern — this dynamic feature repeatedly appears at cycle lows and consolidation phases
Undervaluation background — all 92 points occur when Bitcoin's trading price is below its power law trend line
Historical periods represented:
Early Bitcoin (2011-2013):
December 2011: $2.85-3.25
June 2012: $6.29-6.67
January 2013: $15.50
2015 bear market bottom:
January to April 2015: $227-294 (multiple clusters)
Classic accumulation zone
Various consolidation phases:
Spread across 2016-2020
Post-2022 bear market rebound
Recent 2026
Current state background:
Current n = -18.08, dn/dt = 0.040, the system is in a bear market quadrant, but the dynamics are trending toward stability (positive dn/dt).
The 92 historical precedents show this is a recurring pattern in Bitcoin's lifecycle — undervaluation periods, short-term slowdown in declines, often before rebounds.
This is textbook dynamic similarity — regardless of the absolute price level, periods where Bitcoin exhibits similar behavior patterns can be identified! #Gate广场四月发帖挑战