Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
A rather tense situation inside Zcash. The ECC development team, which is the main driving force behind the project, has decided to step back from the current organizational structure. Josh Swihart, CEO of the Electric Coin Company, revealed that essentially the entire development team has left. This was not a decision taken lightly, but a reaction to what they describe as a gradual drift away from the project's original mission.
The critical issue is with Bootstrap, the non-profit organization overseeing ECC and Zcash governance. According to Swihart, the Bootstrap board of directors—featuring figures like Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai—has taken directions that deeply contradict Zcash's initial intent. What makes this even more interesting is the mechanism used: not outright layoffs, but what ZCAM calls 'constructive resignation,' meaning unilateral modifications to contracts that have made it unsustainable to continue working with integrity.
However, the development team is not abandoning the project. They are establishing a new entity with the same personnel and the same goal: creating 'unstoppable private money.' Swihart emphasized that the Zcash protocol itself remains intact—this is not a technical fork, but rather a move to protect the work done over the years from decisions they see as harmful from a governance perspective. It’s a conflict of vision about where the project should go, not a technical issue. How this new parallel structure will develop remains to be seen.