Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Trump's signature on the $100 bill: what does it mean for the crypto market?
The US dollar is about to experience a rare historic moment—on March 26, 2026, the US Treasury officially announced that starting from June, the new series of $100 bills will feature Trump's signature, with other denominations to follow. This marks the first time in over 160 years that a sitting president's signature appears on US paper currency, breaking a tradition since 1861.
Once the news broke, reactions in the crypto community were more intense than in traditional financial circles. The reason is simple: the crypto market has already been turbulent over the past week.
The day before this announcement, stablecoin giant Circle just experienced its "darkest hour"—a leaked draft of the "Payment Stablecoin Compliance and Reserve Transparency Act" caused USDC to plummet by 20% in the secondary market, with billions of dollars in liquidity evaporating instantly. The most eye-catching clauses in the draft included "prohibiting non-bank institutions from earning interest on reserve assets" and "mandating stablecoin issuers to accept direct guidance from the Federal Reserve." This implied that Circle's profitable model—holding user funds to buy US Treasuries for interest—could be legally confiscated, transforming this compliance giant from an independent tech company into an "outsourced window" of the Federal Reserve.
On March 27, Bitcoin just broke below the critical $69,000 level. Uncertainty in Middle Eastern geopolitics, rising oil prices fueling inflation fears, and nearly $14.16 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on Deribit have kept the market on high alert.
At this critical moment, Trump's signature is set to appear on the dollar.
For the crypto world, the symbolic significance far exceeds the actual impact. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated in a press release: "There is no more powerful way to demonstrate our great historical achievements than by printing President Trump's name on US currency." This bluntly indicates that the dollar is shifting from a "nation's credit" to a "personal brand."
This perfectly hits the core narrative of the crypto space. The Bitcoin whitepaper begins with "a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, without the need for financial institutions." Over the past few years, this narrative has been simplified to "resisting fiat over-issuance" and "fighting inflation." But now, with a president's signature on dollar bills, the story can be further upgraded: fiat currency is becoming politicized and personalized, while Bitcoin remains the only "depersonalized" currency.
Even more intriguing is Trump's changing attitude toward crypto. From early criticism calling Bitcoin a "scam," to personally issuing NFTs and launching DeFi projects, and now signing his name on the dollar—he is actively tying his personal brand to money.
In December last year, he renamed the US Institute of Peace to the "Trump Institute of Peace," included Kennedy Center in his name, and even planned to name a new battleship the "Trump-class." Now, it's the dollar's turn.
California Governor Gavin Newsom sarcastically posted on X: "Now, when Americans pay more bills in daily life, they’ll clearly know who to hold accountable." This comment has been widely shared in the crypto community, with discussions focused on Bitcoin and USDC.
Returning to the market perspective, the actual impact of this change needs to be analyzed separately. In the short term, US law ensures that all circulating currency retains legal tender status; the new bills won't invalidate old ones or affect the dollar index. However, the market sentiment has already shifted—on Eastmoney's discussion board, investors interpret this event as "the politicization of the dollar → accelerated de-dollarization globally → the rise of digital RMB/stablecoins."
In the medium term, stablecoin regulation is tightening worldwide. The US's GENIUS Act, the EU's MiCA, and Hong Kong's Stablecoin Regulations are all vying for monetary power in the digital age. The 20% plunge in Circle's stock already proves that the closer a project is to traditional finance's "regulatory model," the more vulnerable it becomes in political games. When the dollar itself begins to carry strong personal political connotations, capital may quietly favor "decentralized, code-driven" assets.
As for the $100 bill with Trump's signature, it will start being printed in June. If the government later wants to revoke this measure, it can only stop printing new bills and let the old ones gradually exit circulation—this process will take a long time. So, in the coming years, Trump's signature will appear alongside the dollar in countless wallets.
For the crypto community, this may not be a short-term catalyst for a surge, but it could become an important footnote in the 2026 crypto narrative shift: as fiat currency becomes more like personal memorabilia, Bitcoin may become the most "neutral" choice.