Anthropic wins court support, orders to halt the Trump administration's plan to ban its AI tools

MaticHoleFiller · 2026-03-27T17:04:22+00:00

Claude chatbot developer Anthropic PBC wins court order to block Trump administration’s plan to ban government use of its AI technology. Previously, Anthropic stated that the plan could result in the company losing billions of dollars in revenue.Federal District Judge Rita F. Lin issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday, suspending the government’s plan to cut all contact with Anthropic during ongoing related litigation in the San Francisco federal court. She also temporarily stayed the order for seven days to allow the government time to appeal.Anthropic filed a lawsuit earlier this month seeking to prevent the Department of Defense from announcing a decision that the company poses a threat to the U.S. supply chain. This further escalates the high-stakes dispute over the military’s use of AI technology “safety guardrails.”

MaticHoleFiller

2026-03-27 17:04:22

The developer of the Claude chatbot, Anthropic PBC, has won a court order blocking the Trump administration’s plan to prohibit government use of its artificial intelligence technology. Previously, Anthropic stated that the plan could lead to the company losing billions of dollars in revenue.

U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday, suspending the government’s plan to sever all ties with Anthropic during the ongoing litigation in federal court in San Francisco. She also stayed the order for seven days, allowing the government time to appeal.

Earlier this month, Anthropic filed a lawsuit attempting to block the Department of Defense from declaring that the company poses a threat to the U.S. supply chain. This escalates the already high-stakes dispute surrounding military use of AI technology and its “safety guardrails.”

“If the concern is the integrity of the operational command chain, the Department of War could simply stop using Claude,” Lin wrote in her ruling. “Instead, these measures appear to be punitive against Anthropic.” She also stated that such actions are “typical of illegal retaliation in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.”

Anthropic welcomed the ruling in a statement.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.