Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Under geopolitical fluctuations: Global foreign capital outflows from the US, South Water significantly buys Hong Kong stocks | Guotai Haitong Investor Microbehavior Insights Manual, March Issue 2
(Source: Yi Guan Market Outlook)
Author: Fang Yi / Guo Yinhan / Tian Kaixuan
Core viewpoint: This period’s market trading activity cooled down, while the profitability effect edged up. From the funding side, financing capital saw a slight inflow; the marginal issuance of actively managed mutual funds tilted higher; ETF capital saw a slight outflow; and foreign capital flowed out of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks.
Summary
▶ Market pricing status: Market trading activity declined, while the profitability effect edged up. 1)Market sentiment (down): This period’s market turnover rate fell; the average daily trading value for all A-shares dropped to 2.5 trillion; the number of daily limit-up boards fell to 65.4; the maximum consecutive limit-up count was 4.5 boards; the limit-up success rate fell to 70.0%; and the number of stocks appearing on the Dragon & Tiger榜 (Top List) was 51. 2)Profitability effect (up): This period’s proportion of stocks rising increased to 34.9%; the weekly return median of all A-share stocks rose to -1.2%. 3)Trading concentration (up): Both first-level and second-level industry trading concentration increased. The number of industries with turnover rate historical percentiles at or above 90% reached 10 this period. Among them, four industries such as oil & gas and coal had turnover rates at or above 99%.
▶ A-share capital flows: Financing capital saw a slight inflow this period, while ETF capital saw a slight outflow. 1)Public funds: This period’s newly issued size of equity-focused funds rose to 22.62 billion; the overall equity allocation of public funds decreased. 2)Private funds: In March, the private fund confidence index fell by 0.1% versus February; positions edged up versus the prior period (as of 3/6). 3)Foreign capital: Outflow of 1.04 billion USD (as of 3/11); the historical percentile (MA5) of northbound capital’s trading share fell to 24.5%. 4)Industrial capital: This period’s IPO initial offering raised 290 million yuan; the size of placements/targeted issuances was 1.15 billion yuan; and the unblocking scale of restricted shares in the next period is expected to be 26.79 billion yuan. 5)ETFs: Passive capital flowed from inflow to outflow; ETF outflow this period was 15.11 billion yuan; the passive trading share decreased quarter-on-quarter to 5.8%; and industry trading concentration CR5 increased versus the prior period. 6)Financing: Net purchases rose to 18.28 billion yuan this period; and the trading value share rose to 9.5%. 7)Retail investors: Alternative indicators show retail investor activity edged up.
▶ A-share industry allocation: There are clear divergences among foreign capital, financing capital, and ETF capital. 1)Foreign capital: (as of 3/11) Most first-level industries saw outflows. Net outflows leading included Electronics (-160.4 million USD) / Power Equipment, and Banks (-91.7 million USD). 2)Financing: (as of 3/12) Power Equipment (+6.05 billion yuan) / Basic Chemical (+4.07 billion yuan) saw leading net inflows; Nonferrous Metals (-4.04 billion yuan) / Defense & Military Industry (-1.22 billion yuan) saw leading net outflows. 3)ETFs: At the industry level, passive capital shows a net outflow trend. Utilities (+2.61 billion yuan) had the leading net inflow; Oil & Gas & Petroleum & Chemical (-4.15 billion yuan) / Biopharma (-2.15 billion yuan) had leading net outflows. In second-level industries, Power / Grid Equipment saw the leading net inflow, while Refining & Trading / Batteries saw leading net outflows this period. ETFs that led in additional holdings this period include Grid Equipment ETF / Power ETF, etc.; and the leaders in financing net purchases include E fund/富国政金债ETF? and Bosera? (富国政金债ETF / 博时可转债ETF融资净买入居前). Venture Board ETF and CSI 300 ETF led in net redemptions, while Hang Seng Tech ETF led in financing net sales. 4)Dragon & Tiger榜 funds: Environmental protection, Basic Chemical, and Computer were the top three industries on the Dragon & Tiger榜.
▶ Hong Kong stocks and global capital flows: Southbound capital surged in, while global foreign capital edged in to the Japan market and the Korea market. This period, the Nasdaq index closed down -1.3%; major global markets all fell across the board; and Indonesia’s Composite Index (-5.9%) led the decline. Capital dimension: 1)Southbound net buying increased to 52.44 billion yuan, reaching the 96th percentile since 2022 (MA5). 2)This period (as of 3/11), net fund flows from developed markets for active/passive strategies were -9.908 billion yuan / 21.207 billion USD; for emerging markets, active/passive net flows were -2.248 billion yuan / 4.152 billion USD. Looking only from the foreign-capital definition, global foreign capital’s marginal inflow went mainly to Japan and Korea; Japan (+1.57 billion USD) and Korea (+2.57 billion USD) were the top inflow destinations by scale. Looking at overall global flows including domestic capital from each country/region, Japan and Korea were the top recipients. Global non-US and Japan funds saw an increase in net subscriptions, with net subscriptions for US stock energy/industrial funds leading.
▶ Risk warning: There is a risk of bias in the data statistics methodology; errors in the data estimations; and bias risk in data learned from third-party institutions.
Disclaimer
Cathay Haitong Strategy Team
A massive amount of information and precise interpretation—right here in the Sina Finance APP