July 29 morning: BTC analysis
After BTC bottomed out at 62,700, it saw a rebound, rising to a peak of 64,179. However, upward momentum then weakened, and the price gradually fell. The current trend is choppy, with clear overhead pressure. Support below is holding things up, so it is unlikely to see a one-way move in the short term.
Market back-and-forth trading is intense, with large swings. The current price is around the middle of 63,690. There are heavy resistances above at 63,800–64,000, while short-term support sits below at 63,500.
Short-term strategy: watch whether the price can rebound

Tensions in the Middle East region have escalated again, and the market’s risk-averse sentiment has clearly heated up. Bitcoin’s safe-haven and value-preservation role has become more prominent: risk-hedging funds have begun entering the market to position themselves to hedge uncertainties. In the short term, it will provide effective support for prices, and the chart has the momentum to rebound and move upward. $BTC $ETH

This morning, when I woke up, I saw a take-profit email from Gate.
BTCUSDT long position—take-profit triggered. (Here it shows as a short, which should mean shorting at the take-profit level.)
I didn’t try to catch the absolute top, and I didn’t fantasize about riding the whole leg of the move—just executed according to the plan set in advance.
The market will always have the next opportunity; consistently following the plan is more important than occasionally nailing one big move.
I’ll log this.
(PS: The email shows UTC time; converted to Beijing time, it’s roughly around 8 a.m.)

JUST IN: Coursera (NYSE: COUR) takes roughly one-third of LearnVector after a $100M strategic investment, valuing the AI education startup at about $300M. If LearnVector scales personalized AI tutoring, it could broaden Coursera’s enterprise reach. $COUR

7.29 BTC early morning market observation
In the Asian market’s early session, the downward move from the previous night continues. The current price is consolidating around the low near 63,100. The market has already been pricing in relatively tight interest-rate expectations in advance; risk appetite keeps weakening. Funds are actively reducing positions to avoid uncertainty around the overnight rate-setting meeting decision. High-position chips are cashing out in a concentrated manner, and short-term selling pressure continues to be released. Trading is quiet in the early session, liquidity

$ETH It’s rebounding right away. Target: 2000. Longs winning.

No hype, no bias—after these results came out, I went back and reread everything myself. The chart kept repeatedly battering at high levels, but every time it surged up, there was a lack of follow-through. What really made me commit, though, was that the key level above never got effectively digested.
Shorts were initiated around 0.15696. After the price pulled back to 0.1396, the pace clearly shifted downward, and the +218.02% feedback also shows this call didn’t deviate. During the process, I didn’t rush to chase—I was mainly waiting for the rebound strength to be confirmed.
The more the mar

Ondo has been charting the path of making RWA on-chain for two years
Now they’re moving on—private high-speed transaction networks are more reliable
This isn’t a small team turning around
Ondo is the biggest banner in the RWA narrative
BlackRock’s BUIDL followed their route
They found something
Real institutional trading doesn’t care about decentralization
What they want is speed, privacy, and certainty
Blockchain can’t deliver all three
What’s interesting is that BlackRock and Fidelity just co-backed the Clarity Act
One side is legislating to push compliance; on the other,

Sharing yesterday’s performance: I profited in the European session, but couldn’t resist continuing into the US session, which led to a loss. Later, I liked the appropriate entry level, so I cut losses by 3% and entered. I’d also set my take-profit point.
After waking up this morning, I immediately took profit.

【$SOL Signal】4H MACD death cross extending + sell-side depth suppression, short-term scalp for shorts
$SOL Bid/Ask depth ratio 1.31; sell orders’ thickness keeps pressing down on buy orders. The 1H MACD golden cross forms, but the momentum bars quickly shrink; any rebound lacks strength. The 4H Bollinger Band midline at 74.86 acts as resistance. Price has been ranging within 73.2-74.0 for two straight hours; bulls lack incremental capital to push higher.
🎯Direction: Short
⚡Entry/limit orders: 73.6982 - 73.9200
🛑Stop loss: 74.6592
🚀Target 1: 72.8112
🚀Target 2: 72.2568
🛡️Trade

What really caught my attention was that after the price surged higher multiple times, it never managed to form a valid continuation. At that moment, I wasn’t carried away by the superficial spike—I waited until selling pressure reappeared, then decided whether to take part in this pullback.

I opened a short near 0.0681; the current price is 0.0496, and the profit feedback is +1301.18%. This isn’t just luck—it's the result of high-level pressure and the gradual accumulation of details like weak rebound.

The easiest mistake to make in trading is starting to chase after the price has already

To be honest, after this round of feedback came in, it still feels pretty good in my heart. During the intraday bottoming phase, it may seem like it keeps repeating, but in reality, the key levels above $XRP are getting heavier and heavier. Each time there were a couple of pushes higher, there was no follow-through, so the shorts naturally had more room to play.
My entry is around 1.1134, and I executed a long. The market didn’t unfold in the most aggressive way, but the price gradually pulled back to 1.072—+345.65% has already played out on this call.
Trades like this don’t need you to take p

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says US should not ban Chinese AI models.

JUST IN: LULA token on BSC reported a suspicious attack, with estimated losses around $578k per TenArmorAlert. If confirmed, risk signals for layer-2/DEX security and ongoing BSC ecosystem scrutiny. $LULA

OpenAI's account of the Hugging Face breach reads like a credential-hygiene checklist, not an AI horror story.
> entry point: exposed credentials, not a model exploit
> footprint: four separate accounts
> spread: four publicly available third-party services
> real lesson: an agent's blast radius equals every key it can reach
the model was never the weak link. the secrets sitting in the open were.

JUST IN: Uniswap founder clarifies v4 fee model—LPs still earn 30 bps per trade, protocol adds 5 bps (roughly 14% of total fees) with no change to LP profits. CEXs typically charge 100–200 bps, making Uniswap’s tier cheaper. $UNI

$KLAC Even with the same 1000U, the outcomes are worlds apart—some people bottom-fish and profit, while others chase higher and lose everything! Today, we’re going to go at it directly with data.
Bears vs Bulls: KLAC is down 13.73% in 24h, with trading volume of $3.6M, the low at 167.96—total bear domination, with 170 smashed through without hesitation. The bulls struggled and bounced to 201.88, but were immediately hammered back to 173.8—utterly weak.
The key duel: the high at 201.88 vs the current price at 173.8, a drop of 14% like a slap in the face. Trading volume is $3.6M, and there’s a c