#稳定币监管与发展 Korea's recent moves are quite interesting—they directly cut off the space for risk asset transfers at the account level. In simple terms, it's similar to stock market practices: freezing suspicious accounts during the investigation phase to prevent illegal proceeds from being withdrawn or transferred to escape.

I think the impact on the trading ecosystem is worth paying attention to: on one hand, tighter regulation will indeed crack down on traders who profit from price manipulation and scalp trading, which is a good long-term filter for the market. On the other hand, this also means that regulatory intervention is deepening—from monitoring trading behavior to controlling capital flows, making the financial attributes of virtual assets increasingly clear.

For us copy traders, the key is to improve our ability to identify and assess traders' risk control capabilities. Not all high returns are worth copying, especially those that rely on extreme volatility or fuzzy strategies to accumulate gains. Under tighter regulation, these risks are actually amplified. I now pay more attention to traders with transparent strategies, strict stop-loss rules, and steady returns—no matter how regulation tightens, their trading logic can stand the test.

Practice truly proves everything. When the regulatory environment changes, our copy strategies must adapt accordingly.