There has been a clear change in the Meme track recently—the competition logic is upgrading. In the past, everyone competed on how quickly they could issue tokens and circulate them, but now platforms are playing a deeper game. Taking four Meme platforms as an example, their ecological catalysis plans are essentially shifting from purely traffic platforms to roles that incubate ecosystems.



This shift is highly significant for project teams. They will select truly promising projects and provide long-term support and resource advantages. For developers, this is far more attractive than just attracting players.

The most money-consuming part of building a project now is customer acquisition. Promoting and marketing on your own is ridiculously costly. If you can access a mature ecosystem that offers exposure opportunities and strategic support, it essentially helps project teams quickly solve two major problems—how to cold start and how to survive.

This approach is quite interesting. Rather than simply acting as a transaction intermediary, it’s more about deep resource binding. Compared to that, this grassroots ecosystem empowerment is more attractive to builders who truly want to do something, and it’s easier to retain them.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 01-24 09:31
Wow, this is the real upgrade—going from just harvesting profits to truly building an ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-23 23:34
Wow, this is the real upgrade in gameplay. Finally, a platform has figured it out. Just throwing coins without investing in the ecosystem is a paper tiger.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpavip
· 01-22 08:52
Cold start is indeed a bottleneck, and spending money on marketing feels like a bottomless pit. If the ecosystem empowerment approach can truly be implemented, it would be really promising.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-22 08:49
Listen, compared to those overnight wealth dreams, I have more confidence in these builders who are actually doing the work. Honestly, customer acquisition costs are ridiculously high, and pouring money into promotions is simply not feasible. The idea of ecosystem empowerment is pretty good; it's much more reliable than platforms that just take a cut and then run away.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermitvip
· 01-22 08:49
Yes, that's right. Customer acquisition cost is the real bottleneck, and this point was well articulated.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 01-22 08:37
Yeah, this approach is correct. Upgrading from cutting leeks to nurturing leeks truly broadens the perspective. Customer acquisition cost is the real killer. Those small projects previously relied on marketing, which was a money-burning black hole. Now, with the backing of major platforms, they can save half of the funds. Developers definitely value long-term support more than retail investors, as not many truly want to build something substantial. It's a bit like a venture capital model; the ecosystem is the future competitive advantage. Honestly, this is more imaginative than the initial token issuance race mode, but it still depends on who can ultimately incubate reliable projects. The platform's ecosystem strategy is essentially about locking in quality developers. After all, the builders who survive the big waves are the most valuable.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin