A steady profit is really just one thing—repeatedly capitalizing on high-probability events.



Last week, a fan asked me: "I followed your strategy three times, two small gains and one small loss. Isn't that probability too low?" I responded by asking him: "If you flip a coin three times in a row, can you guarantee all heads?" He was stumped.

This principle sounds simple, but it is the true root of why most people lose money. Their mistake is one—mistaking short-term fluctuations for patterns, and chance for certainty. I have survived three bull and bear cycles in the high-volatility market of ZKP, relying on this very mindset. Today, I want to be honest with everyone and share.

**The First Lesson of Probabilistic Thinking: Admit Ignorance**

When I first entered the market, I was also obsessed, constantly pondering whether there was a "holy grail indicator" that could accurately predict rises and falls. The crash in 2018 woke me up—it showed me that the market doesn’t operate that way. Essentially, it’s a game of probability; the only certainty is uncertainty itself.

How should I think about it? Imagine yourself as a top poker player:

- Focus not on the outcome of a single hand, but on the total profit after 100 hands
- Bet big when holding good cards, and immediately fold when facing unfavorable situations
- Always base decisions on expected value, not luck

Let me speak with my real trading data. I have a ZKP breakthrough strategy with a win rate of only 58%, but the profit factor reaches 1.8. In other words, for every unit of risk taken, I can expect to recover 1.8 units in the long run. As long as I keep executing this logic, time will naturally allow mathematical principles to work.

**The Three Pillars of Systematic Trading**

The first is to find a probability advantage. Many traders dream of a 90% win rate, but they end up wiped out by rare black swan events. My strategy library includes a trend-following system with a win rate of only 35%. It sounds unimpressive, but its net profit data over the past three years is no joke. A low win rate isn’t scary; what’s scary is an insufficient profit factor—that’s the key.
ZKP-2.9%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
DAOdreamer
· 01-24 18:59
Well, this logic is actually just another way of explaining compound interest. Consistently small wins add up to become a big winner.

That's right. I used to be very fixated on single trades being right or wrong, but I later realized that long-term data is what truly matters.

Profit factor > win rate—that's what traders should focus on. Honestly, most people have it backwards.

Keep at it, and time will prove everything. Math doesn't lie.

Wait, are you telling me your system with a 35% win rate can still earn steadily? That's pretty incredible.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 01-23 13:03
Coins are a perfect metaphor. I used to be that guy—losing my composure after three times of not making a full profit.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-22 03:50
A 58% win rate can earn 1.8 times. This data indeed defies those who boast about 90%... Persistence is the true winning mindset.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-22 03:50
An 58% win rate with a 1.8 profit factor is truly surviving; many people are still dreaming of that perfect 90% strategy.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 01-22 03:43
58% win rate with a 1.8 profit factor. This data sounds genuine, unlike those guys who boast about a 90% win rate.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGriller
· 01-22 03:41
Coin theory sounds comfortable, but I still want to see on-chain data.

To put it simply, only those who live long enough have the probabilities on their side. The little guys get wiped out trying to hit a big one.

58% win rate with a 1.8x multiplier—if this data is real, it's indeed top-notch. The only concern is whether the data is cherry-picked.

I've also been involved in that wave of ZKP; those who survive are indeed following this approach. Admitting ignorance is better than anything else.

There's no problem with the profit logic; the key is that persistence is the hardest part. Most people give up after the fifth heartbreak.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistaker
· 01-22 03:35
The analogy of coins is excellent, but to be honest, I still get easily brainwashed by short-term fluctuations... I need to gradually understand the concept of profit factors.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned