Recently, the topic of RWA has been extremely popular, but it seems that everyone discussing it has overlooked a reality—the gates of traditional finance are simply not open to on-chain assets. Goldman Sachs is unlikely to place its trading books on a fully transparent public blockchain; this is not a technical issue, but a matter of business confidentiality and compliance bottom lines.



In contrast, Dusk’s approach is quite interesting. Instead of blindly trying to force open this door, it has chosen to become the door itself. From day one, compliance and privacy have not been afterthought features but are embedded into the core design of the entire system. This pragmatic approach is quite surprising.

Their actual actions make this clear. Their collaboration with licensed digital securities exchange NPEX is not just a typical strategic partnership announcement; they have deployed a complete issuance, trading, and clearing system on-chain. From the first appearance of assets to every subsequent transfer, the entire process naturally operates within a regulatory framework. The design of the XSC token standard is particularly noteworthy—compliance requirements like whitelists and lock-up periods, which would normally require complex legal logic, are directly encoded into smart contracts. Issuers no longer need to start from scratch to build a compliance framework.

This provides a solid foundation for ecosystem expansion. Traditionally illiquid assets like corporate bonds, real estate shares, and private equity funds suddenly have a new stage that combines liquidity with compliance. More importantly, the privacy protection technology introduced by Dusk offers both parties a "controllable transparency" environment—you can prove full compliance to regulators without publicly revealing your positions and trading details. This is indeed a major advantage in attracting institutional funds.

Security is also a core competitive edge. The application of zero-knowledge proof technology ensures transaction privacy, while the verification process maintains effectiveness, allowing both compliance parties and traders to meet their needs—such a balance is rare.
DUSK1.47%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
SquidTeacher
· 01-24 02:57
Damn, finally someone has explained this clearly. Really, RWA is just the emperor's new clothes; Goldman Sachs and others simply can't put it on the chain. That's something only someone with a broken mind would do.

But Dusk's logic is indeed impressive. It's not about knocking down the door but about becoming the door itself... I have to give it a thumbs up for this idea. Writing compliance into the core, making it controllable and transparent—this is brilliant. Institutional investors are all about this approach.

As for the XSC system... well, it depends on whether the subsequent ecosystem can truly take off. Hopefully it won't just become another concept.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 01-23 09:00
Yeah, this idea is indeed brilliant. Instead of trying to pry open the door, it's about becoming the door itself. That's true enlightenment.

These days, everyone talks about RWA, but they're still dreaming that Goldman Sachs will reveal its secrets. Laughable. I really respect Dusk's "controllable transparency" logic.

Integrating compliant programming into smart contracts—that's real innovation, much better than those projects that just hype themselves up all the time.

Zero-knowledge proofs combined with privacy design should make institutions excited. Achieving both confidentiality and transparency—who wouldn't want that?

By the way, if this continues, on-chain real estate will only be a matter of two years. The liquidity bottleneck is finally being seriously addressed.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 01-22 01:44
Finally, someone has revealed the truth about RWA. Most projects are indeed just dreaming. Dusk's "controllable transparency" logic has some substance; integrating compliance into smart contracts is not simple. Will institutions really buy into this...
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-22 01:37
Finally, someone has spoken the truth clearly. Other RWA projects are just dreaming.

The reality is that Goldman Sachs cannot cooperate with you. Instead of knocking on doors, it's better to build your own. The Dusk approach is indeed bold.

Incorporating compliance into smart contracts saves a lot of legal costs. This is what real disruption looks like.

The combination of privacy protection and regulatory framework is a powerful move. Institutional funds will only truly get involved when they see this.

Zero-knowledge proof technology is indeed impressive in balancing security and efficiency, but its practical implementation still depends on subsequent development.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 01-22 01:30
Hey, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. The previous bunch of RWA projects were all hype, I knew it was all nonsense.

Traditional finance would never show you their underwear, this isn't something technology can solve. Dusk's approach is more realistic — instead of struggling to knock on the door, why not become that door itself? Compliance is embedded from the very beginning, and the perspective is different.

The design of XSC is brilliant, directly encoding legal logic into the contract. Institutions will actually use this.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin