Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion around the Web3 storage sector, and the Walrus project has repeatedly appeared. I also took a closer look and feel there are indeed many points worth discussing.
This is not the kind of protocol that relies on hype. Walrus is solving a real and longstanding problem—Web3 applications need to be both cost-effective and user-friendly when handling data storage, which is very difficult to achieve simultaneously. Early TPS data looked promising, but once dealing with large datasets, performance started to falter. Storing data not only costs a lot but also involves complex operations. By 2026, this contradiction has become even sharper: AI agents require long-term memory support, and on-chain dynamic data at 4K levels is increasing, but existing solutions simply cannot handle it.
Walrus adopts an engineering mindset—rebuilding large-scale storage from the ground up, avoiding flashy designs, and instead emphasizing stability and scalability. For developers, this bottom-up cost reduction capability is the real necessity.
One aspect I particularly like is that Walrus takes "long-term data availability" as its core goal, rather than just focusing on short-term gains. Currently, the real risks for many NFT and AI projects are not user churn but long-term data access issues. Walrus uses the Red Stuff erasure coding scheme, which is logically self-consistent: under the premise of ensuring security, it minimizes redundancy, directly impacting its commercial viability.
Honestly, it’s still too early to talk about $WAL price fluctuations; it’s more like early infrastructure. It may not generate daily hot topics, but once the ecosystem develops, it will be more stable. I see it as a "foundation" in Web3—quietly in the background, but when it truly proves useful, its value becomes evident.
---
Storage issues have always been a pain point; I like Walrus's straightforward approach.
---
Infrastructure with strong cost-reduction capabilities can stand the test; others are just fleeting clouds.
---
The perspective of long-term usability is quite good; most projects indeed haven't considered this layer.
---
The Red Stuff erasure code scheme sounds reliable; this is exactly what engineers should be doing.
---
$WAL is still too cold now, but cold assets tend to be more stable, stronger than those riding the hype every day.
---
Infrastructure projects should be like this—no need for daily spam, just be useful.
---
The long-term memory problem of AI agents really needs a solution; Walrus's approach hits the mark.
---
Lack of flashy concepts actually makes people trust more; there aren't many projects like this nowadays.
The Walrus approach is indeed solid, addressing not false needs but real bottleneck issues. I was also wondering why on-chain storage hasn't taken off, and it turns out these contradictions haven't been sorted out yet.
Hmm... but I haven't fully understood the Red Stuff plan yet. Could you elaborate or provide a white paper link?
The biggest risk in early infrastructure is team跑路 or sudden changes in direction. How is the stability of $WAL? If you know, please share.
As for storage, once AI really starts to use it, there might be a small explosion. Holding some now might not be a bad idea.
This has potential; the pain points in data storage have held back Web3 for too long.
Infrastructure, in the beginning, no one believed in it. Only after it’s used do people regret not jumping on earlier.
That makes sense. Right now, everyone is talking about application layers. Who cares how solid the underlying infrastructure is?
The Red Stuff solution is really clever. Reducing redundancy means cutting costs, and developers will definitely buy into it.
People are overly optimistic about infrastructure; it's easy to overestimate. We need to wait until the ecosystem truly takes off before making judgments.
I'm a bit convinced, but I still want to wait until the mainnet runs stably before watching.
It sounds like talking about utilities like water, electricity, and gas, but Web3 is missing these boring but necessary things.
If AI really explodes in 2026, this demand will definitely be a necessity. Jumping on early is not a bad idea.