Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Recently discovered an interesting project planning to launch a token generation event (TGE) in April. The initial allocation design of this project is quite unique—it directly links to your social account age. The participation threshold is not high, and the process is straightforward: connect your social account, follow the project team, leave a comment, like, and share posts, and you're basically done. Although this type of early participation mechanism is quite common now, seeing the project team attempt to filter participants through account history is noteworthy; it’s a way to gauge activity and authenticity. For those interested in emerging crypto projects, this is a case worth watching.
---
April TGE again, filtering out old users, feels like a disguised way to cut the leek list
---
Connecting social accounts to exploit, this time the threshold is indeed low, but the authenticity is just talk
---
Using account history as a filter? Basically, it’s just fear of witch attacks. Projects that started doing this early are all dead now
---
Wait, if the quota is directly linked to account age, what about new accounts? Feels like a game for old players again
---
It’s worth observing, but I care more about whether the price will go up after TGE or not
---
I’ve seen this kind of mechanism many times, usually the tokens are dumped after issuance, let’s wait and see
---
My old account finally comes in handy, but it’s better to stay cautious
---
Connecting social accounts at this step is a bit suspicious. How are permission requests reviewed? I haven't seen an audit report.
---
It looks like a authenticity screening, but actually it's just an upgraded version of a sheep wool-harvesting ticket, nothing new.
---
TGE in April? It's only March now, too little information. Let's wait for the audit results.
---
Using account history as a filtering criterion? This trick can fool new users, but veteran players know it's a disguised signal of a rug pull.
---
Just by looking at this process design, you can tell the project team is desperately trying to build a marketing funnel.
---
Re-entry attacks are an old trick, and people are still using them. This project's security awareness is questionable.
---
Social account verification itself is a pseudo-need; white hats have already found ways to bypass it.
---
No hype, no blackening—this is just an ordinary airdrop project with no significant observation value.
The April TGE sounds pretty good, but I wonder if it will be another scenario where the issuance drops below the listing price.
Connecting accounts as a verification method is actually quite clever, much more reliable than completely open airdrops.
By the way, this logic of filtering through account history feels like indirectly encouraging everyone to grow their accounts? Not sure how this will play out in the long term.
The combination of reposting and liking is basically treating participants as promotional tools, huh.
Is an older account necessarily more active? Question mark.
April TGE, observe first, then act.
It's the same routine of connecting social media, following, and sharing. Every time claiming to filter authenticity, but what’s the result?
It sounds pretty unoriginal; the mechanism is similar to other projects.
Using account age as a threshold... it’s somewhat interesting, but I have doubts whether it can prevent female wolves.
According to this logic, my old accounts should be favored? Haha.
Likes, shares, comments— isn’t this just flooding? What authenticity?
TGE in April? First, see if the project team is reliable; otherwise, it might just be another sheep-cutting scheme.
This screening mechanism is quite clever, at least it can block a lot of bots and wool parties.
The interaction threshold isn't high, but honestly, you still need to discern whether it's just another air project.
I still agree with the account history dimension; it's more reliable than just looking at wallet activity.
---
Relying on social account history to judge authenticity? Feels like a pretty deep trick, gotta be careful not to get cut.
---
For April TGE, just follow and share directly, the process is super smooth... But can the authenticity be guaranteed?
---
The advantage of old accounts is finally being utilized this time, but it still depends on whether the project itself is reliable.
---
Filtering by account age? I just want to know how effective it can be; the airdrop hunters have already learned how to grow accounts.
---
It's interesting, but this participation threshold feels a bit... easy to mess up?
---
Tying it to account age is indeed innovative, but we'll see in April. What are people hyping up now?