Nothing unexpected to see here. Honestly, it's pretty typical pattern—you see a project team get called out for past exits, they rebrand their pitch to something like "infofi" and suddenly act like they're different. But let's be real: human nature doesn't reset that easily. People just get better at adapting their tactics. They find new angles, new narratives, but the core playbook tends to stay the same. So when a team decides to stick with the status quo instead of actually changing, you have to wonder if it's just business as usual with a fresh coat of paint. This is exactly why due diligence on project teams matters in this space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 4h ago
Still the same old tricks, just changing the name to try to turn things around? I've seen enough of that.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshivip
· 4h ago
Same old tricks, I'm tired of this routine... Just one "infofi" post, and it's all a scam.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 4h ago
Changing the name without changing the substance, it's obvious at a glance. The tricks in this circle are always the same; just rebrand the name and expect to be reborn? That's a joke.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 4h ago
It's just a different presentation of the same old trick; I've seen this routine too many times in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)