2026-01-19 19:40:35

#数字资产市场动态 The secret to small account doubling has never been luck.

There's an old saying in the crypto world: the less capital you have, the more you need to keep your temper in check.

I've seen many traders with three or five thousand in their accounts go all-in on contracts, only to be wiped out by a single opposite move. But I've also seen someone start with 1,200 yuan and steadily grow it to 45,000. Their difference isn't intelligence; it's one word—"patience."

I know a trader who entered the market with just this amount of capital. My only advice to him was: don't bet on quick wins with others, bet on long-term growth with yourself.

And what was the result? His account doubled to 25,000 in three months, and reached 45,000 in five months. Throughout the process, he never got liquidated. He didn't learn any complicated technical analysis; he simply did three seemingly simple, yet 99% of people can't do:

**First, always leave a backup plan.** Others see the market rising and go all-in; this guy, even when optimistic, only used 30% of his total funds. Leaving a safety net isn't cowardice; it's treating trading as a long-term game. Most people get wiped out on their first all-in, but he survived a hundred times.

**Second, only trade confirmed trends.** When the market is tangled and uncertain, he can lie back and not watch the charts all day. This isn't laziness; it's respect for his trading discipline. Once the direction is clear, he strikes hard and fast—take profits at the target and never greed for more.

**Finally, use rules to control impulses.** Cut losses decisively at 2%, take half profits at 4%. Never add to losing positions, and don't increase positions due to emotions. No matter how tempting the market, this approach remains unchanged.

In short, the biggest enemy of small accounts isn't the market—it's impatience. Those who can grow from a few thousand to tens of thousands are those who treat "slow" as a weapon.

In today's highly competitive market, the ones who truly profit are always the most patient.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredStaker

· 8h ago

That's a great point, it's all about mindset. Most people are still too greedy.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 8h ago

1200 to 45,000? Now that's real stability, much better than those who wake up from overnight riches only to get liquidated. Exactly, small investors need their own way of doing things. I have a friend who went all-in every three months and lost everything, never even considered having an exit strategy. The key is still that 30% stop-loss rule. It sounds simple, but few people can really stick to it... I’ve also been burned by emotions many times before realizing this. I find it funny when people only reduce their position by 4%, too many are just waiting for a double, only to get wiped out in a reversal. Staying calm truly is the most valuable trait, but unfortunately, most people break this in the second wave of the market. Small accounts are really most afraid of panic; this article hit home for me.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 8h ago

Exactly right, but the word "沉" is really difficult. I've seen too many people who start dreaming of getting rich overnight before their accounts reach five figures, only to end up wiped out in two months.

View OriginalReply0

Lonely_Validator

· 8h ago

Exactly, it's maddening. A couple of years ago, I went all-in like that and wiped out in a week. Now, I have about 30% of my position slowly growing, and I feel much more secure.

View OriginalReply0

SquidTeacher

· 9h ago

Honestly, I've heard the story of going from 1200 to 45,000 several times... but it really is both so simple and so difficult.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 9h ago

It should be pointed out that your set of arguments is essentially a popular interpretation of the Kelly formula — obviously, the mathematical model for risk management was proven as early as 1956, but 99% of people choose to ignore it.

View OriginalReply0