Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
When building Layer2 infrastructure, I often need to find a balance between the main chain and side chains. A recent project has helped me re-understand the elegance of Plasma — it’s not simply moving data off-chain, but establishing a clever "information compression +全民验证" mechanism.
**On-chain only needs a "fingerprint," not all details**
Imagine you manage a transaction settlement center. Every day, dozens of side chains submit data from various sources. If you store all transactions on the main chain, the costs will explode. But you don’t have to do that — you only need each side chain to periodically submit a Merkle root hash, like a "fingerprint" of the data.
The brilliance of this design is: anyone can take a specific transaction and verify whether it is included in a certain "fingerprint," but reverse-engineering it is almost impossible. The smart contract on the main chain acts like an unchangeable safe, locking these hashes that represent the complete state. This way, storage costs can be reduced to a few hundredths of the original.
I previously deployed a side chain for a DeFi platform, where users can perform dozens of swaps per second, but the main chain only sees an update every 10 minutes. From a certain perspective, scalability is essentially information compression, and the security foundation is ensuring that this compression is irreversible.
**Off-chain celebration, on-chain verification**
The key question is: what if the side chain operator cheats? That’s when the fraud proof mechanism comes into play. Anyone, whether other validation nodes or ordinary users, can act as a "whistleblower" — when they find anomalies, they construct a proof showing that the submitted Merkle root by the side chain is incorrect.
This mechanism effectively turns the main chain into an "arbitration court." It doesn’t need to monitor every action of the side chain constantly; verification only occurs when challenged. Once fraud is confirmed, the side chain’s collateral is forfeited, and this economic penalty is enough to deter most malicious behavior.
For users, this means that fund security is ultimately guaranteed — even if the side chain encounters issues temporarily, there is a sufficient time window for honest validators to expose the truth. This is why Plasma can become a Layer2 solution: it balances scalability efficiency with decentralized security.