2026-01-19 11:01:17

The true value of artificial intelligence does not solely depend on how advanced the technology itself is, but is more influenced by human willingness to adopt and the readiness of the workforce. In other words, no matter how powerful the technology, it still requires people to use it; no matter how intelligent the system, it needs a suitable team to operate it. Technology is just the foundation; real transformation comes from the society and organizations' ability to adapt to and reshape with new technologies.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

26 Likes

Reward
26
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BloodInStreets

· 01-21 20:28

In plain terms, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the risk... It's like the bottom-fishing theory; technology is just the price, and the real profit depends on who can hold on.

View OriginalReply0

BoredRiceBall

· 01-21 17:57

That's right, technical brilliance doesn't necessarily mean the ability to change the world

View OriginalReply0

TokenStorm

· 01-21 15:14

Well... to put it simply, technology is just on-paper data; adoption rate is the real risk factor. --- I agree with this logic, but on-chain data shows that most teams simply can't keep up, it's another round of harvesting. --- Alright, even the most advanced AI needs someone to operate it. My backtest data can prove this point. --- The key is still the people. No matter how strong the technology is, without execution, it's just decoration—just like the project I went all-in on. --- So, the real profit always comes not from the technology itself, but from those who can adapt quickly. --- Interesting. This explains why the projects I was optimistic about still crashed... Oh no, it's the team’s problem. --- The safest place is the eye of the storm. Whoever uses it first makes the most money; latecomers get harvested. The story always goes like this.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 01-20 07:25

At the end of the day, it's still a human issue. No matter how powerful AI is, someone has to know how to use it.

View OriginalReply0

MechanicalMartel

· 01-19 11:30

In plain terms, no matter how awesome AI is, it still relies on humans to operate it.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 01-19 11:30

Looking at it again, it's the same old spiel... Basically, no matter how advanced the technology is, someone has to know how to use it. Isn't this just whitewashing for those project teams that have raised funds but haven't launched yet? I've seen too much on-chain data; with concentration of funds, you can tell who's bluffing.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-19 11:29

Well said, no matter how advanced the technology is, someone has to know how to use it.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 01-19 11:21

Basically, no matter how advanced the technology is, if people can't use it, it's useless.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-19 11:17

Well said, no matter how advanced the technology is, if people can't use it, it's useless. The industry should have realized this long ago.