AI explosion, surge in high-quality NFTs—the Web3 world is being overwhelmed by data. Training a decent AI model requires an astronomical amount of data, and 4K, 8K video NFTs, audio files are even monstrous in throughput. On-chain storage? Too expensive to believe. Turning to centralized cloud services? That would betray the original intention of Web3.



This contradiction has found a breakthrough at Walrus Protocol.

Simply put, what Walrus does is straightforward but ruthless—making storage both ridiculously cheap and sufficiently flexible and programmable. Your NFT metadata, high-definition videos, personal databases—store whatever you want, all on truly decentralized networks, with costs reduced to levels you wouldn’t expect. What’s the coolest part? Even if one-third of the network nodes fail simultaneously, complex mathematical algorithms ensure your data can still be fully recovered. Such fault tolerance is hard to find anywhere else in the market.

But Walrus’s ambitions go far beyond this.

The dream of decentralized AI has long been stuck on a pain point: how to store and transfer massive model weights and datasets in permissionless environments? Walrus’s architecture is uniquely suited for this, almost tailor-made for DeAI. It’s easy to imagine that in the future wave of decentralized AI, Walrus could become one of the most fundamental and critical infrastructures.

Looking at the role of $WAL—the token—it acts as a bridge between storage providers and data demanders, the lifeblood of the entire ecosystem. Ultimately, what we’re seeing is not just a storage solution, but the gradual formation of infrastructure for the Web3 media era and AI era. This story is just beginning.
WAL-0.11%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
TokenDustCollector
· 01-22 10:07
Walrus is indeed an interesting idea, but can the storage costs really be cheap to an unbelievable extent? I'm still a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 01-22 02:45
Damn, this is the real infrastructure, not those flashy gimmicks.

Wait, one-third node failure can still be recovered? How complex does the math have to be...

Haha, how did they come up with the name Walrus?

If DeAI really takes off, storage costs need to be brought down. Right now, it's really bottlenecked.

Hmm... Is $WAL really the blood of the ecosystem, or is it just another way to cut the leeks?

Early infrastructure is often overlooked. People regret not getting on board until it explodes.

This logic makes sense and is much more reliable than those vapor projects.
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapy
· 01-19 10:52
Walrus's idea is indeed brilliant; the high storage costs and difficulties are solved in one go.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 01-19 10:51
Damn, Walrus really hit the pain point, no exaggeration.

One-third of the nodes go down and data can still be recovered? How outrageous is this mathematical algorithm...

The positioning of WAL is quite interesting, a dual track of storage + AI, can it take off by the end of the year?

Wait, can the cost really be pushed down that low? Feels like just on paper.

The infrastructure competition for DeAI has been heated for a long time, it's not easy for Walrus to secure this position.

But on the other hand, after so many years of developing decentralized storage, is this really just a rebranding with no real change?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 01-19 10:46
Wow, Walrus's architecture is really impressive. One-third of the nodes are down, yet it can still recover data? That's some serious math skills.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-19 10:35
Wait a minute, is on-chain storage really that expensive, or are we all being scammed?

Walrus's logic sounds good, but decentralized storage has been hyped up so many times...

Can a third of the nodes fail and still recover? That math needs to be pretty hardcore. Has anyone actually verified this?

Can $WAL avoid becoming just a speculative token? The key still depends on real-world application implementation, brother.

What sounds good is just infrastructure, but in the end, it still depends on who can survive until that day.

Is this really different this time, or are we going to be trapped again for half a year?

Storage issues are indeed bottlenecking, but Walrus can solve it? I reserve my opinion.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemes
· 01-19 10:34
Really? Storage costs can be pushed this low? I don't believe it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-19 10:31
Wait, one-third node failure can still be recovered? That's some serious math, I need to dig into the specific parameters of erasure coding...

But on the other hand, once the underlying storage infrastructure gets stuck, the DeAI arbitrage space above is directly wiped out. How is the tokenomics of WAL designed? Could it be dumped by big players?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin