Recently, a leading DEX launched an interesting on-chain buyback reserve mechanism. In simple terms, the platform automatically allocates 20%-40% of the daily collected fees to buy back the platform's tokens, with full transparency and on-chain data traceability.



This mechanism is quite flexible. Unlike fixed buyback ratios that never change, the new reserve can dynamically adjust based on current liquidity conditions and market fluctuations. This means that during good market times, the buyback can be intensified, while during downturns, the protocol won't be trapped. The team also plans to launch the fifth phase of buybacks by the end of 2025, stacking two mechanisms that can allocate up to 80% of the protocol's daily revenue for buybacks.

Where does the money come from? All revenue generated from perpetual contract fees and "Shield Mode" will flow into this pool. What's truly noteworthy is that the platform explicitly positions this as a long-term tool directly linked to revenue, not a short-term price speculation scheme. The design logic is quite clear—using real revenue to support the token's value, rather than relying on marketing hype.

For traders, this mechanism at least indicates that the project team is seriously considering the long-term holding value of the token. However, the actual effectiveness still depends on liquidity depth and actual trading volume performance.
MODE5.56%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 01-22 07:38
80% buyback? Sounds impressive, but if the liquidity can't keep up, it's all for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 01-21 13:03
Dynamic adjustment is indeed smart, not a blunt one-size-fits-all approach. When the market is bad, it can still protect itself.

I believe in transparent on-chain activities, which are much more reliable than those projects that secretly buy back tokens.

It all depends on whether the subsequent trading volume can keep up; otherwise, having money without users is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 01-19 08:55
Transparent buybacks sound good, but the key is whether real money is actually being invested.

---

Using 80% of daily income for buybacks? That number sounds a bit aggressive. Can liquidity support it?

---

Finally, a project that doesn't play fancy tricks, just speaks with its income.

---

Dynamic adjustments sound smart, but I'm worried it might just become an excuse to cut the leeks again.

---

We still have to wait until 2025; first, let's see if the current situation can really hold up before bragging.

---

This buyback mechanism is good, but if trading volume doesn't pick up, it's pretty much useless.

---

On-chain traceability? Let's wait and see. Anyway, the cost of faking isn't low.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 01-19 08:53
The 80% buyback力度 is still quite aggressive, but the key is whether the actual trading volume can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissentervip
· 01-19 08:46
Wow, 80% of daily income is all used for buybacks. Either they really have confidence, or they're desperate... I don't quite understand.

By the way, no matter how flexible the buyback mechanism is, it still needs trading volume to support it. Without sufficient liquidity, even high fees are useless.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidatedvip
· 01-19 08:37
Haha, really, this mechanism looks much more reliable than those air buybacks.

20-40% directly on-chain, market conditions can be amplified when good, and flexibly adjusted when bad. This approach is indeed clear-headed. But the biggest concern is still whether trading volume can keep up. No matter how good the buyback mechanism is, if liquidity dries up, it's all for nothing.

An 80% daily income buyback sounds impressive, but the key is how much actual trading fees can be generated. Let's wait and see the performance of Phase 5 in 2025.

I've never seen a buyback driven by perpetual contract fees before. The logic is quite straightforward—more frequent trading means more token support, no problem there.

But honestly, anyone can talk about long-term value; it depends on whether they secretly cut the proportion during a bear market. We need to keep observing the data to be reassured.

This kind of transparent buyback is definitely better than those mysterious manipulations, at least you can see where the money is flowing.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivatorvip
· 01-19 08:35
Finally seeing someone seriously doing buybacks instead of just talking without action, I respect this attitude.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin