Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
There is a major exchange launching $SENT tonight, and I plan to participate. Let’s talk about why.
First, the project itself. Sentient is an open-source AI network platform, not just a simple model or application tool. It builds the GRID network that integrates models, Agents, data, and computing power, enabling various intelligent agents to collaborate and evolve, ultimately forming a long-term self-sustaining open-source ecosystem — this approach is different.
From actual results, the product indeed has solid capabilities. ROMA once ranked first on GitHub, SERA leads in DeFi benchmarks, and ODS’s search accuracy surpasses GPT-4. These are tangible outcomes, not just hype.
But I think what’s more worth paying attention to is — Sentient solves a long-standing problem in open-source AI: who contributes, who uses, and how are the benefits distributed? All of these can be fully tracked within their system. Using OML fingerprint technology for transparency and traceability ensures that open-source projects can survive and have the ability to generate value. This model is indeed rare.
Looking at the tokenomics, 65% goes to the community, the team is locked for 7 years, and investors are limited. The annual inflation rate is kept very low. This isn’t for short-term speculation; rather, it forces the project to grow sustainably over the long term, while maintaining incentives and governance for the entire network.
Finally, to be honest, I’ve seen too many AI projects in the past two years — no matter how big the PPTs or how loud the slogans, in the end, they’re all hollow. Sentient at least provides a direction: open-source AI can be sustainable, and its value can truly be realized. So tonight’s participation isn’t just following the hype, but betting on this direction.
However, the comparison with GPT-4 feels a bit superficial. Has ODS really outperformed?
This wave of lock-up design is truly sincere and substantial, much better than those projects that are eager for quick gains.
Really? Search accuracy surpassing GPT-4? We need to see actual benchmark data to be sure.
7 years of locking-in is not a gimmick; this is true sincerity.
Wait, the team is locked in for 7 years? How insecure do you have to be?
Giving 65% to the community, and the rest? Expecting a dump and a full pump.
By the way, projects that can truly solve the issue of profit distribution have been around for a while; they're not just now starting to tell stories.
Beating GPT-4? Laughable. I could write a white paper claiming I surpass it.
Betting on the direction, huh? I bet it will spike tonight and then crash tomorrow.