Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Big project is here! While OpenAI invests hundreds of billions in infrastructure to stay competitive and closed-source models turn advanced AI into paid tools, Sentient is changing the game through another approach. Their "Open-Source Intelligent Production System" is not just a rebellion against a single model but a fundamental rearchitecture of the entire AI innovation process.
Traditional AI development has been monopolized by a few giants, but Sentient's GRID network offers a new answer: in a distributed ecosystem of over 110 partners, data, computing power, and models become modular, disassemblable, and freely combinable. It's like the industrial revolution moving from handcrafted workshops to assembly lines—AI innovation is no longer a closed-door technology of a few companies but a transparent collaborative process involving developers worldwide.
Some may ask, can open source really compete with closed source? The answer is yes. Sentient's ROMA recursive intelligent agent can decompose complex tasks as flexibly and controllably as building blocks, and ODS open deep search allows open-source models like DeepSeek to tie with GPT-4o in reasoning tests—closed-source models tell stories through black-box engineering, while this side has already demonstrated that open source can reach the same technological heights through engineering solutions.
Deeper innovation lies in the economic model. The open-source world has long faced a challenge: how can contributors receive fair compensation? Sentient solves this with the OML protocol and model fingerprinting technology, giving every line of code and every model a "value ID card." Usage is billed, and profit-sharing occurs during optimization. This completely breaks the dilemma that open source can only "run on love," enabling ecosystem participants to truly monetize their code.
This revolution has now reached the commercialization stage. Supported by Founders Fund with $85 million, Sentient's native token SENT has entered circulation—GRID is the backbone of the ecosystem, ROMA and ODS are technical tools, OML is the revenue engine, and SENT is the fuel driving the entire value network.
Important upcoming milestones:
SENT Token | Major Wallet Sales Channel | January 19, 2026, 20:00-22:00 (UTC+8)
---
If this time they can truly boost the wallets of open source contributors, that would be a real revolution.
---
Wait, with only 85 million in funding, daring to compare with OpenAI? That's quite bold.
---
The GRID network sounds like another version of a data DAO, but the key still depends on how the real applications land.
---
Token circulation means there's a chance? First, see how many real projects are running in the ecosystem.
---
Distributed ecosystems sound great, but I'm afraid in the end, the top nodes still call the shots.
---
Wait, is SENT this round truly fundraising or just another storytelling project?
---
A distributed ecosystem sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another PPT revolution.
---
I like the logic of code monetization; finally, no more free riding.
---
85 million USD. If this money is wasted, it would be hilarious.
---
Can ROMA really be flexible and controllable, or is it just hype?
---
Open source versus closed source? Ha, I'll see how the market chooses first.
---
OML protocol feels a bit promising, but how exactly does it work?
---
Over 110 partners, that sounds pretty superficial.
---
On January 19, 2026, I need to see what the final price will be.
Wait, 110 partners might still be mostly hype; the real contributors probably aren't that many.
The idea of monetizing code sounds great, but I'm worried it might just become another new way to cut corners and exploit users.
Suddenly, I feel like DeepSeek's approach might be similar, just not as flashy.
The SENT launch timing feels a bit rushed, like they're chasing the latest trend.
Why do open source models always have to compare themselves to GPT-4o? Isn't it better to think differently?
This round of funding looks really promising, but the true hard indicator is the stability of the ecosystem, my friend.
---
ROMA and ODS sound good, but can they really deliver stable output?
---
The idea of code monetization is good, but I'm worried it might end up being just another tool to cut leeks
---
Over 110 collaborations? Feels like a hype, how many are actually usable?
---
Founders Fund invested 85 million, showing confidence, but we've seen all the tricks in the crypto world
---
This is what Web3 should be doing, not just speculating on coins
---
Open source alliance vs tech giants, the real game behind the scenes is more interesting
---
Does every line of code have an ID? Sounds like blockchain stuff, but implementation is another matter
---
Wait, how does the OML protocol ensure transparent profit sharing?
---
Distributed ecosystems are getting old, the key is who is truly participating