2026-01-18 15:28:32

In the crypto industry, most teams choose to avoid regulation, and some even oppose it. But the real turning point comes from the minority — they don't bypass the rules, but redesign products to embrace compliance.

Identity verification infrastructure is a typical example. Balancing regulatory requirements, privacy protection, and user experience is extremely challenging, almost like dancing on a tightrope. The idOS Network is undertaking this arduous task — building an identity infrastructure that can serve regulated use cases without sacrificing privacy and ease of use. This "three-win" design approach is precisely the focus of competition in the next phase of Web3.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-20 07:42

To be honest, most projects are still thinking about how to evade regulation, and the idea of embracing compliance is indeed rare. The idea of idOS sounds good, but can a three-way win really be achieved? It seems someone always has to suffer. In terms of compliance infrastructure, this is indeed the area to focus on in the future. Whoever gets it done first will win. But to be fair, teams like this often face a bumpy fate, and it depends on how things unfold later. Dancing on a tightrope, one misstep and you could be shattered to pieces—this is even more risky than fighting regulatory risks. Privacy and compliance are inherently at odds; the level of balance required is extremely high.

View OriginalReply0

GasBankrupter

· 01-19 19:23

Haha, the group that embraces compliance is indeed rare, but this move is probably the long-term kingly strategy. Really didn't expect identity infrastructure to cover so many dimensions—regulation, privacy, and user experience—all indispensable. Who came up with this requirement? idOS is a good move, but it seems to require killing a lot of brain cells to execute... I can't perform a wire-walking dance. Web3 ultimately has to follow this path; projects that dodge and evade will eventually fade away.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-18 15:51

Hmm... Compliance is easier to talk about than to implement, but the idOS approach is indeed innovative.

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 01-18 15:45

To be honest, most projects are still sleepwalking. The idea behind idOS is indeed different. Compliance may seem boring, but if someone really gets it right, they will definitely take off. But "three wins" sounds a bit idealistic; let's see how it works in practice. The world has long suffered from regulation, but instead of逃不了, it's better to understand it thoroughly first. I'm a bit curious whether this set of identity infrastructure can really withstand the test of time. This is the right path; stop messing around with trivial tricks all day long.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 01-18 15:34

Sounds good, but can it really be achieved? Most projects are still operating on the edge under the guise of compliance.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-18 15:32

To be honest, I think this is the right way. Don't always think about opposing; isn't compliance the future pass to entry?

View OriginalReply0