2026-01-18 04:33:32

Recently, I have been paying attention to developments in the AI field, and one viewpoint in particular is quite thought-provoking. Some believe that the human lifespan is about 7 years, but the iteration cycle of AI is completely different—technological breakthroughs can occur roughly every 7 months. Technologies that once seemed like far-fetched roadmaps are now gradually becoming reality.

The future is not far away. We will be able to have intelligent agents directly undertake our work tasks, which could be the most imaginative application direction in the AGI era, especially in vertical applications within professional fields. Once this trend is realized, the entire way of working will be redefined.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RektCoaster

· 01-21 03:08

A technical cycle lasts 7 months. If that's true, our group is going to be squeezed very hard. The era of intelligent agents working is here. Should we learn to compete with AI or just give up? Every time I see this kind of argument, I think, are those jobs that are said to be irreplaceable doing well now? No, at this rate, AGI will be knocking on the door very soon. It feels like it's already too fast to slow down; no one can escape this wave of technology. I'm optimistic about vertical applications. The real wealth code is probably here.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 01-21 03:06

lmao 7 months vs 7 years? that's literally a 12x speedup in iteration cycles... ngl the math checks out but people still sleeping on the real play here - vertical ai agents that can execute trades autonomously. imagine the mev extraction potential alone 💀

Reply0

ConsensusBot

· 01-20 10:54

A 7-month cycle? That's crazy, but thinking about it carefully, it doesn't seem to make any sense. Wait, will we all be able to clock out by then... I trust the agent to do the work, but the real competition is probably who can train the smartest batch. Vertical application in specific fields definitely has opportunities; sectors like healthcare and legal services rely heavily on expertise. Honestly, I'm a bit anxious, but this wave of dividends is really here.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 01-20 10:06

7 months for a technology cycle? This speed is really crazy, it feels like humanity hasn't even reacted before AI has upgraded and iterated --- Agent working for us sounds great, but is the career crisis real? --- Laughing to death, what was impossible last year is now achieved this year, this is the power of exponential growth --- Vertical application implementation is the key, general AGI is still early, don’t be too optimistic everyone --- 7 months vs 7 years, this comparison is too incredible, no wonder big companies are burning money crazy on AI --- Hey, if this continues, we might really witness history? But it’s also pretty terrifying... --- Redefining work methods = massive layoffs? Or creating new opportunities? Hard to tell for now --- Imagination is strong, but the real mature commercial application still depends on the performance next year or the year after --- Progress doubles every 7 months, at this rate, in two or three more years, we’ll be unstoppable, but it feels like there’s not enough time

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 01-18 05:02

A multiple-fold breakthrough in 7 months? To be honest, that's a bit exaggerated, but it's indeed ridiculously fast. Wait, does this mean my skills are already outdated in half a year? I'm actually more optimistic about AI agents taking on work; vertical fields are where the money is. Human work methods will need to be redefined... It still seems like whoever works harder first will outcompete the other. If this wave really materializes, I need to think ahead about what I can rely on to survive.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-18 05:02

A 7-month cycle? Damn, that's crazy. Honestly, I'm a bit scared. It feels like I haven't even fully processed that technology has taken another big step forward. If agents in vertical fields really arrive, traditional workflows will need to be completely reshaped. This isn't evolution; it's a whole new way of life. But then again, I've heard this argument at least ten times... When will it actually be implemented? Smart guys are all betting on agents, and I'm also observing, but I still feel like the roadmap and actual productization are worlds apart.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 01-18 05:02

Breaking through a multiple in 7 months might sound a bit exaggerated, but looking at the current speeds of GPT, Claude, and Deepseek, it doesn't seem far-fetched? Honestly, the most concerning thing is that those vertical domain-specific AI agents are really starting to get work done. What are we supposed to do, haha? Wild ideas are turning into reality at an incredible speed. Wait, so the things we're studying now might be outdated in just a few months? In my opinion, the key is who can commercialize these AI agents first. The race is right there.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 01-18 04:59

Doubling in 7 months? The speed is truly incredible, it feels like I fall behind if I don't check the news for half a year. The era of AI workers is coming. Does this mean traditional jobs are going to be phased out? Honestly, I feel a bit anxious, but I can't help but be excited... Maybe this is the feeling of a new era beginning. Wait, does the implementation of vertical applications mean that some jobs will disappear directly? Thinking about it seriously, it's a bit scary. But if automation can really be achieved, having more time to research on-chain opportunities would be wonderful. Grabbing this wave of AGI dividends is the real secret to wealth. The roadmap is becoming a reality, it feels like we are living in an accelerated era. 7 months vs 7 years, the gap... Are humans starting to fall behind?

View OriginalReply0

SelfMadeRuggee

· 01-18 04:45

A 7-month cycle? Damn, that speed is really outrageous, I feel like I can't keep up. AI agents working... honestly, it's about grabbing jobs, but I actually have a bit of anticipation. Those who said it was impossible are probably eating their words now, haha. If this really materializes, many people will have to relearn their skills.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 01-18 04:38

A technical cycle in July? Such speed... It’s indeed a bit outrageous, but upon reflection, it doesn’t seem entirely unreasonable. Wait, does that mean we all have to rewrite our career plans? AI working has been talked about for many years, and now it really feels like it’s starting to become reality. Speaking of which, if this really materializes, do retail investors still have a chance? Or is it just another feast for big corporations? Vertical fields are quite interesting; they’re much more reliable than general AGI. However, a 7-year lifecycle compared to a 7-month iteration... It feels like humans are at a bit of a disadvantage in this competition. It seems many people haven’t even realized it yet. If you’re anxious, just be anxious.

View OriginalReply0