Recently, the Sentient AI project was launched on a major exchange wallet with a new token listing. The simultaneously released tokenomics data has sparked quite a bit of discussion. The most attention-grabbing detail is the only 2% public sale ratio—this design approach is indeed worth pondering.



In terms of token distribution, the entire mechanism leans significantly towards the community. 65.55% of the total supply is allocated for community-related purposes, which is uncommon in AI projects. Specifically, 44% is directly used for community incentives and airdrops, with the remaining supporting ecosystem operations. This design logic is quite clear: giving the project's growth potential to participants rather than being sliced up by early-stage financing.

On the other hand, although the 2% public sale ratio seems aggressive, it precisely indicates the team's confidence in the project itself and avoids common fundraising traps. The overall structure is quite rational, not a typical scheme of raising funds just for the sake of fundraising. In the current landscape of countless crypto projects, this community-first logic is indeed rare.
SENT-1.82%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
SpeakWithHatOn
· 01-20 04:08
2% Public Sale? This guy really dares to do it, either very smart or very confident.

---

65% to the community, sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another scam in the end.

---

Honestly, I've heard this community-first rhetoric many times in the crypto world; the key is how they execute it later.

---

The data looks great, but I don't know how long it can last.

---

Finally seeing a project that isn't about crazy fundraising, quite interesting.

---

Is 2% real? That must mean fundraising is really difficult.

---

Community incentives make up the majority; let's see if it turns into another way to cut the leeks.

---

Compared to those that leave 50% to the foundation, this is definitely much better.

---

Awesome is awesome, but the key is having real value.

---

Both community-first and long-termism are just buzzwords.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 01-19 16:59
2% public sale? How confident are they? Or is there another deeper meaning? We need to see how they proceed next.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 01-18 18:14
Wait, 2% public sale? This feels like a trap for retail investors.

A 65% community allocation sounds great, but will it really be implemented? Just the Airdrop enthusiasts talking nonsense.

Confidence in the team is something every project claims; let's see how the token price performs later.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 01-17 19:55
2% public sale? This guy really dares to do it, isn't he afraid of losing it all?
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 01-17 19:50
Wait, 2% public sale? I need to look at this number again, something feels off...

---

Community takes 65%, I've seen this trick too many times, and in the end, it just leads to a dump.

---

If you really believe in this, you're too naive. The crypto world is full of tricks.

---

Oh, here comes another statement: "We give the power to the community." Wake up, everyone.

---

With only 2% circulating supply, I’ll just do the opposite. I've seen this kind of thing many times.

---

Why is the team so confident if they still need to raise funds? The logic doesn’t add up.

---

Community first? Let’s see who’s on the whitelist first, same old story.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-17 19:38
2% Public Sale? I've seen this trick too many times. Whether it's real or not will only be known after it goes live.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 01-17 19:28
Wait, 2% public sale? This isn't confidence, it's probably just fear of dumping.

But on the other hand, giving 65% to the community is indeed rare; most projects wouldn't dare to do this.

It feels like another one of those beautiful stories that will be tested once it actually circulates.

Airdrops sound good, but the question is, when will they be credited, everyone?

This logic sounds comfortable, but the crypto world is never short of comforting stories.

The team’s confidence routine feels pretty tired already; let's just wait and see how the trend develops.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin