Recently, I noticed the WAL project. The high throughput capability it demonstrates is exactly what I believe infrastructure projects should look like. Truly competitive projects rely not on fancy rhetoric and hype, but on whether their read/write efficiency can perform well in the market.

As a participant in the technical field, I have always been optimistic about protocols that can genuinely improve the overall efficiency of the industry. Looking at comparable projects, many shout loud slogans, but their core technical indicators often cannot withstand scrutiny. In contrast, projects that make substantial progress with each technical iteration are worth deep follow-up.

If your timeline is focused on the next two or three years to achieve real application scale, then observing the technical updates of such protocols is very important. Instead of being led around by various influencers' calls, it's better to understand the underlying efficiency logic yourself. This is the correct way to find opportunities in the infrastructure track. Applications like TIMI and FUN are also building ecosystems, and the progress of their technical infrastructure will ultimately determine how fast they can grow.