2026-01-17 04:18:59

Here's the real issue at stake: it's not about whether HUGGI has AI elements or whatever technical labels we throw at it. The core problem is that someone talented just lost their livelihood over this whole situation. That matters way more than we're discussing it. The guy knows his stuff—solid technical chops, problem-solving skills, the whole package. Honestly, there are teams out there that would benefit from having someone like that. BagsApp could be a solid fit to get things moving in the right direction again. First things first: solve the employment crunch, and then everything else can fall into place.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMuskRat

· 01-19 18:42

NGL, this is the core. People losing their jobs is more important than any AI label...

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 01-19 07:27

To be honest, it's pretty unfortunate that this guy lost his job. In the tech industry, it's like this—one wave of public opinion can directly ruin someone's livelihood. Who cares?

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 01-17 05:16

Honestly, that's the real point... Losing a job is more serious than any AI label.

View OriginalReply0

NeonCollector

· 01-17 04:46

Brothers, at the end of the day, it's about a person's livelihood being lost—that's the real issue. Life is tough. Helping someone truly capable is worth much more than arguing over AI label values.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-17 04:44

To be honest, rather than obsessing over what AI actually is, I care more about this guy's livelihood... that's the real point, right? Truly capable people wouldn't just stay silent like this. It would be perfect if BagsApp could take over. First, solve the issue of earning a living; everything else is negotiable. The whole thing is ridiculous—technical discussions are fine, but what about people's livelihoods? It can't just be left hanging.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-17 04:41

Really, instead of worrying about the虚的 AI label, it's better to think about how to help my buddy find a new job. --- This guy确实有两把刷子, but unfortunately got坑了 by this matter, which is a bit regrettable. --- It would be great if BagsApp could really accept him, at least he could start over, right? --- The most urgent issue is livelihood, everything else is浮云. --- The optimized talent is just闲置了? Isn't there a shortage of people in Web3? --- Talking more is useless; the key is that someone is willing to want him. --- First solve the饭碗问题, then talk; that's the重点, right?

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-17 04:41

That's the real point. Losing a job is more heartbreaking than any AI label.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineNewbie

· 01-17 04:37

To be honest, instead of talking about AI, it's better to think about how to protect our jobs. That's the real core.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-17 04:33

NGL, this is the real point. People losing their jobs are more valuable than any technical label. Guys with skills are just being wiped out like that, which is really fucked up. If BagsApp is smart, they should hurry up and recruit this person. Don't let the genius sit idle.

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBearDrawer

· 01-17 04:32

To be honest, compared to obsessing over AI and these abstract things, we should care about people's livelihoods... Are tech giants just going to lose their jobs like that?

View OriginalReply0