Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Looking back at the controversy from a few months ago. At that time, there were private discussions where people subtly accused me of riding the coattails, leveraging the influence of a certain KOL or DAO. Some even asked if I was intentionally creating conflict between the Flywheel and Lighthouse DAOs.
Even Anymose's statement seemed to carry some implied meaning—hinting that my actions within Lighthouse DAO were targeting Flywheel.
The criticism during that period was quite intense. In the end, I made the decision: to directly announce my withdrawal from Lighthouse DAO on Twitter.
This incident reflects the complexity of interpersonal relationships within DAO communities. When multiple DAO ecosystems coexist, participants can easily become entangled in various stances. Sometimes a single decision can trigger a chain reaction—public opinion, doubts, and ultimately possibly leading to withdrawal. This is also an area where the Web3 community needs better governance mechanisms.
Honestly, sometimes quitting is the clearest choice to avoid being continuously exploited.
Web3 governance mechanisms definitely need an upgrade, or else everyone becomes a pawn, and no one will feel good.
---
Honestly, the feeling of being subtly accused by others is really uncomfortable, but withdrawing might seem a bit passive.
---
This is Web3. When more people join, positions become divided. No one can escape the fate of being aligned with a side.
---
I feel the key is still poor communication; everyone is just guessing.
---
That's why I usually don't get involved in too much DAO politics. It's really exhausting.
---
That Anymose moment really had that vibe, the underlying meaning was tightly controlled.
---
Suddenly withdrawing can instead lead to wild speculation. Sometimes, a direct counterattack might be more straightforward?
---
DAO governance mechanisms definitely need improvement; trust and personal relationships alone aren't enough.
---
It seems that to survive in this circle, you have to be diplomatic and not offend anyone.
---
I'm a bit curious about what exactly is going on between the Flywheel and the Lighthouse. There are too many surface-level stories.
Withdrawing is actually quite wise; sometimes it's more clear-headed than hard confrontation.
But honestly, making decisions under this kind of public opinion pressure is always a dilemma. No matter what you choose, someone will criticize.
When will DAO governance stop being so "personal" and full of human feelings? Why does it still rely on personal credit and behind-the-scenes connections?
It feels like the entire circle is just repeating the same script, just changing the name and the DAO.
That's why I usually just watch the fun without getting involved in the factions—it's less stressful.
Leaving is probably the only option. Instead of being constantly criticized, it’s better to just be decisive. Anyway, there are only a few ecosystems, switching to another DAO and continuing.
It’s a bit ironic—Web3 talks about freedom and decentralization, but the interpersonal relationships are more complicated than in Web2. Governance mechanisms definitely need to be reformed.
This is the true portrayal of Web3, with governance mechanisms... I think we should first focus on managing people's hearts.
Just quit if you want to leave. Staying in a place like this only adds to the frustration.