U.S. Senate Banking Committee delays vote on cryptocurrency market structure bill

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Source: Cryptonews Original Title: Chairman Tim Scott postpones vote on cryptocurrency bill Original Link:

Vote Postponed

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee, led by Chairman Tim Scott, has postponed the markup vote on the cryptocurrency market structure bill originally scheduled for Thursday, with no new date announced yet.

“I have spoken with leaders from the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains actively engaged in good-faith negotiations,” Scott stated in a Wednesday release.

Meanwhile, the committee will continue bipartisan negotiations to garner broader support.

“This market structure bill reflects months of serious bipartisan negotiations and genuine input from innovators, investors, and law enforcement,” Scott added, emphasizing that the ultimate goal is “to establish clear rules that protect consumers.”

Bill Background

The markup vote is a critical step in the legislative process, where the committee discusses the bill line-by-line, proposes amendments as needed, and votes on whether to advance it to the full Senate.

The highly anticipated bill under consideration will determine how the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulate digital asset markets.

Industry Opposition

The House of Representatives passed a version of the bill called the CLARITY Act in mid-2025. However, under congressional procedures, both the Senate Banking Committee and the Agriculture Committee must approve the legislation before it can move forward.

The Senate Agriculture Committee also postponed its markup vote on January 13, originally scheduled for the same Thursday. Chairman John Bozeman stated that more time was needed to ensure sufficient votes.

Crypto market participants remain cautious, as one provision of the bill proposes strict restrictions on stablecoin yields, which has become a major point of controversy.

Notably, a compliance platform, as a key industry participant and major lobbyist for the crypto sector, has threatened to withdraw support for the Senate version of the bill after raising concerns about how the provisions could negatively impact its stablecoin business.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
SatoshiSherpavip
· 01-19 02:30
Delayed again, these guys really know how to drag...
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemistvip
· 01-18 15:54
Pushing back again? It feels like this routine has already been played out once. When will it actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 01-17 15:12
Postponed again? This trick has been played out, and they're still "good-faith negotiations." I think all parties are just bickering.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 01-16 10:53
Delayed again? With this pace, when will it actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemurvip
· 01-16 10:53
Using delay tactics again, I'm all too familiar with this trick.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborervip
· 01-16 10:42
Pushed back again? At this rate, the bill will be discussed until the Year of the Monkey and the Horse.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 01-16 10:33
Delayed again, this time probably until the Year of the Monkey or the Horse.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin