Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
American college sports prediction market faces regulatory storm: platform trading volume explodes vs. tightening regulation
【CoinPost】The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) recently pressured the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to suspend college sports-related prediction market activities until a stricter regulatory framework is established to protect student athletes.
NCAA President Charlie Baker wrote a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig on Wednesday, explicitly stating that college sports prediction markets must be halted without sufficient protective measures. What is Baker’s main concern? The rapid growth of sports prediction markets has led to a surge in harassment of student athletes by bettors, directly threatening their physical and mental health.
There is also a more troubling issue — most US states set the participation age for sports betting at 21, but prediction market platforms typically allow users as young as 18 to participate. This 3-year gap could attract a large number of college students and even high school students to jump into high-risk speculative pits.
In his letter, Baker proposed several specific recommendations: stricter age restrictions and advertising regulations, enhanced event integrity monitoring systems, introduction of anti-harassment mechanisms, and the provision of risk alerts and harm mitigation resources.
Ironically, despite increasing regulatory pressure, trading volumes on prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have recently surged. Many legislators in Connecticut, New York, Nevada, and New Jersey have already begun taking action to ban or severely restrict sports prediction markets. How the future regulatory landscape will unfold remains to be seen.
---
Prediction markets are booming but students are being harassed. This business is a bit shady.
---
I just want to know if the CFTC will really take action or if it's just another round of empty talk.
---
Protecting student athletes is a good thing, but completely banning trading is too unfortunate.
---
The gap from 18 to 21... what are the platforms thinking? There should be a bottom line even when exploiting loopholes.
---
Sports prediction markets have always been chaotic. Now they want to clean up? It's too late.
---
Harassing student athletes is serious enough; it needs to be regulated.
---
Americans really know how to play. College sports can even be turned into casinos.
The gap between 18 and 21 is really outrageous; regulation always lags behind.
The platform makes a fortune, students take the blame—I've seen this trick too many times.
Harassing athletes is indeed excessive, but don't tell me that a suspension can solve the fundamental problem.
With just this three-year age gap, how many people can it stop? Whether they can come or not is another matter.
NCAA finally can't sit still anymore. It's outrageous that student athletes are being harassed.
Prediction markets are just gambling in disguise. Don't talk about innovation.
Who dug this 3-year gap? It really needs to be investigated.
Platforms are疯狂ly raising money, using students as ATMs. No wonder they want to ban it.
21 vs 18, just a three-year difference and you can participate in betting? Regulatory agencies must be asleep.
Instead of changing the framework, it's better to shut it down directly. This kind of gray area is inherently risky.
Different rules in each state, platforms just run into loopholes,套路 is old news.
Student athletes have become chips, this game is truly inhumane.
Played around by platforms, no wonder NCAA is getting impatient.
Platforms are too ambitious, treating students as cash cows, and now it's been exposed.
Harassing student athletes? That's indeed outrageous, but banning prediction markets? Feels like treating the symptoms rather than the root cause.
A three-year age difference doesn't change much... Are there really that many high school students playing?
NCAA is panicking, indicating trading volume has truly exploded. But banning this kind of financial innovation outright? That's pointless.
Gamblers should have been caught long ago; this gap is indeed outrageous.
Can you play at 18? Are you here to send kids to the gambling table?
But honestly, can this wave of NCAA pressure control the platform... probably not.
Sports prediction markets like this can't be banned no matter what.
Sports prediction markets are just gambling with a different name. Harassing student athletes is truly outrageous.
With such a big gap, platforms will definitely take advantage of loopholes. No one can resist the temptation of money.
NCAA is getting anxious, but it seems like CFTC might not buy it. Regulation of the crypto market has never been quick.
Why is there such a big difference between 21 and 18? It's truly the perfect window for harvesting profits.
This gray area is the most lucrative, but the cost is a group of students losing everything and ending up broken.