Is the era of InfoFi really coming to an end?

Loo

Question

MEV_Whisperer · Accepted Answer

Selling early just to laugh last—it's just another harvest feast.

---

Sounds like the people who talked about liquidity mining last year are now changing their tune to discuss practical application scenarios... That's funny.

---

Real returns? Brother, your question is too naive.

---

Unstoppable—that's the crypto world. When the next hot spot arrives, someone will naturally take over.

---

Bubbles have burst; the projects that survive? Ha, I bet five bucks it’s still those top few.

---

Reliable projects have already gone offline. How many are still around? Well, you guys keep going.

---

Instead of worrying about whether it will die or not, think about where the next trend will be.

---

This kind of rhetoric is exactly like the end of DeFi and NFT cycles—what's the result? Just a cycle.

ContractSurrender · Answer

Basically, it's just a wave of people getting exploited and then pulling out. Truly meaningful projects are few and far between.

Some projects keep changing concepts to hype up, never intending to build long-term.

I just want to know how those high APYs are really generated. Is this logic self-consistent?

The bubble indeed needs to deflate, but the question is how many projects will survive until that day.

Instead of waiting for the bubble to burst, it's better to see clearly now who is truly building.

But on the other hand, this wave of adjustment might actually be a good thing, providing an opportunity to get on board with some reliable projects.

BuyHighSellLow · Answer

It's the same old story... During the mining boom, everyone knew it was just a money grab. Now you're still debating whether there's any real innovation?

Wait, real returns? Don't make me laugh. Those who got out early made money, while those who joined late lost everything.

Basically, it's about who can get out quickly. There's no real strategic adjustment; it's just capital retreating.

0xDreamChaser · Answer

It's starting the "deep adjustment" again, I'm tired of hearing this term... Isn't it just about taking profits from one cycle and wanting to do it again in the next?

I've seen it all along, the truly usable projects are few, the rest are just storytelling.

Wait, are people still mining InfoFi? I laughed.

Liquidity mining made a profit back then, but now? Breaking even is already good.

What they call an adjustment is nice to say, but in harsh words, it’s dead.

Every day asking "What do you think," but you can't really tell anything.

Where is the core value of DeFi? These projects haven't even thought it through.

Real application scenarios? I’d like to see what they are...

As the bubble deflates, what’s left might just be air.

NotFinancialAdvice · Answer

I've been saying this for a while, this wave of infifi is just a change of packaging without changing the recipe. After one round is finished, the next round begins.

It's basically waiting for the bottom to be bought in, don't pretend to be so elegant.

What sounds nice is a deep adjustment, but frankly, it just means there's no one to carry on.

The truly valuable ones should have appeared by now; why are they still just pie in the sky?

The bubble has burst? I think it's only considered burst after they've finished cutting.

Is the era of InfoFi really coming to an end?

Trending Topics

GateLaunchesGateforAI

CryptoMarketsDipSlightly

GoldAndSilverMoveHigher

USIranTensionsImpactMarkets

AISectorRisesAgainstTheTrend

Hot Gate Fun

ulka

ulka

DNAGold

CodeDNA

Göthex

Göthex

Fatir

Ftvix

dan0819

saner

Pin