Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The ranking system of DeFiLlama has a blind spot. Using TVL (Total Value Locked) as a measure is suitable for lending protocols, but it doesn't work well for derivatives DEXs.
What is the key metric in the derivatives market? Trading volume. That is the true indicator of activity.
Looking at the 30-day derivatives trading volume data of Oracle service providers makes this clear—
Stork performs the strongest, with a trading volume of $63.1 billion. Pyth follows closely behind, with a trading volume of $35.4 billion. Although Chainlink has a broad ecosystem, its derivatives trading volume is only $5.6 billion.
What does this gap indicate? There are significant differences in market suitability among different Oracles. Using traditional TVL metrics to evaluate the Oracle choices of derivatives protocols can easily underestimate platforms with high-frequency trading, low collateral lock-up, but explosive trading volumes. The evaluation logic for the derivatives market needs to be recalibrated.
Why can Stork outperform Chainlink so much? 63.1 billion versus 5.6 billion, the gap is huge.