The distribution data of the Based Bill token has raised concerns: 97% of the tokens are concentrated in just 41 wallets. This highly centralized holding structure indicates significant market risk. Early participants and core holders control the vast majority of the circulating supply. If these major holders decide to sell, the potential for price volatility should not be underestimated. Want to stay updated on the real-time movements of token holders? You can monitor the activity of these wallets on relevant data tracking platforms to capture market information and potential liquidity changes in a timely manner. For investors considering participating in the Base chain ecosystem projects, such holding analysis is an important reference for assessing project risk.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 01-18 04:00
97% concentrated in 41 wallets? That's a typical rug pull breeding ground, a paradise for early profit-taking.

When big players sell, retail investors get wiped out. Projects in the Base ecosystem really need to be scrutinized.

This data is too outrageous; it feels like a sudden explosion could happen at any time.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibingvip
· 01-18 03:54
97% concentrated in 41 wallets, how intense is that... Still dare to touch?

---

Another typical big whale manipulation in the crypto circle, I should have known earlier

---

But speaking of which, who dares to chase this data? Monitoring wallets is useless, whether to dump or not

---

Laughing to death, every project in the Base chain ecosystem is like this, what's the use of risk assessment...

---

41 wallets hold 97%, I just want to know when they start selling off

---

Such a bad coin holding structure, and people are still rushing in? Truly outrageous

---

So those still buying now are just bagholders

---

This is why I never touch meme coins again, they are too shady
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidatorvip
· 01-16 15:36
97% concentrated in 41 wallets? Isn't this playing with fire?

Damn, this kind of distribution is a ticking time bomb.

Early entrants are just lying back and enjoying the win; us latecomers can only wait to be hit.

What's the point of monitoring? Instead of looking at the data, it's better to stay far away.

Base Chain projects doing this are so risky that no one dares to touch them.

Basically, it's a cash machine for big players; the next big collapse will be theirs.

This is a damn scam game; 97% concentration is bold enough to be written down.

It's a game for the wealthy; let's not get involved.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperervip
· 01-15 20:46
97% concentrated in 41 wallets? This is just the prelude to a rug pull, am I right?

---

The early folks have already laughed to death, just another scam project’s old trick

---

Monitoring is bullshit, it just looks suspicious, better to avoid it directly

---

It’s always the same routine, what ecosystem project? Basically, it’s just a tool for the whales to cut the leeks

---

These kinds of analyses are too late, the real insiders have already sold out

---

Are there any reliable projects on the Base chain? I really can't see any

---

41 wallets control everything, this is called centralization hahaha
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDayvip
· 01-15 20:46
97% concentrated in 41 wallets, this is obviously just the prelude to a rug pull

---

When big players sell off, retail investors are the ones who have to buy the bag, the tricks are so old

---

Monitoring is useless, if I had known so many big wallets were holding, would I still dare to enter?

---

That's why I never touch early-stage projects, the risk is ridiculously high

---

Only 41 wallets? Then they could rug pull at any time, wake up everyone

---

Talking about position analysis, when things go wrong, who cares about the data? They run faster

---

Are all base chain ecosystem projects distributed like this? Feels like the entire market is rotten

---

I just want to know when those 41 wallets will start selling, give a heads-up in advance

---

97%? Damn, isn't this just the internal market? Retail players are just playing in vain

---

Stop talking about liquidity changes, as long as big players are still holding, there's no safety
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHuntervip
· 01-15 20:44
97% in 41 wallets? Isn't this just the prelude to a rug pull? I've seen through it long ago.

---

41 wallets hold the majority, I just want to ask when will the dump happen?

---

It's the same old trick, with big players holding 97%, how are retail investors supposed to play?

---

With such high concentration, are you still daring to invest? Bro, you're really brave.

---

What are you monitoring? This is obviously a big trap, better stay away.

---

Projects on the Base chain have been increasingly outrageous lately, this one is written right on the face.

---

Getting in early was a huge profit, but now taking over? Not very wise.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 01-15 20:40
97% in 41 wallets lmao, that's not even trying to hide the rug anymore. basically a mathematical guarantee for disaster once the exit liquidity evaporates.
Reply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 01-15 20:26
97% concentrated in 41 wallets? That's what they call fair distribution, haha.

When big players dump, retail investors like us have to buy the dip. The tricks are so old and worn out.

What's the use of monitoring wallets? When they decide to dump, they do it. No matter how fast you react, you can't beat the exchange.

There are so many projects on the Base chain, why bother worrying about this minefield?

Early investors made a fortune, and we just came in expecting to get cut. Classic script.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 01-15 20:24
97% concentrated in 41 wallets? That's a landmine, I wish I had known earlier

---

Same old trick, early investors eat the meat, we drink the soup, it's funny

---

Monitoring is bullshit; instead of watching data, it's better to ask when these 41 big players will dump

---

Are all the projects on Base chain like this? No wonder my friend lost everything

---

This is probably a sign of a rug pull; either it's a rug or on the way to rug pull

---

Can't hold it anymore, talking like a master analyst, but actually just advising people not to touch

---

41 wallets control life and death, why are we retail investors joining the fun?

---

I just want to know if any of these 41 big wallets belong to the team itself, don’t tell me they’re all community wallets

---

Looks like a solid project, but when I checked the distribution chart, I just closed it

---

Instead of tracking wallet movements, it's better to learn when to run away
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 01-15 20:23
Another project with a high rug risk, controlled by 41 wallets, and players are still in a daze.

This is the norm for meme coins. Early investors eat the gains, later entrants take the fall—same old story.

97% concentration? Damn, isn't this just a ticking time bomb? It will blow up sooner or later.

Let's wait and see who runs away first. Anyway, I won't touch this kind of scheme.

The day when 41 big whales dump the market together, retail investors will be wiped out.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin