2026-01-15 11:27:17

Regarding the product layout of a certain LLP liquidity protocol, many industry insiders are pondering a question: while the intention behind setting an entry threshold is understandable, will this move truly be effective?

The key lies in supporting measures. The S3 mechanism, LLP, and on-chain assets used as collateral—these components must form a closed loop to build a complete ecosystem. Merely raising the entry threshold without subsequent product and feature iterations can instead make the market feel like it's just self-consuming its popularity.

The market generally feels that the pace is a bit slow. If the current progress continues, it may gradually lose market attention. The power of a coordinated set of actions often doesn't lie in a single move but in timing and coordination. This is indeed worth deep reflection.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

hodl_therapist

· 01-18 06:04

It's the same old trick again—raising the threshold, but the follow-up can't keep up. Isn't that suicidal? What's the point of discussing the ecosystem before a closed loop is formed? It's just armchair strategizing. The pace is too slow. If this continues, the enthusiasm will dissipate rapidly. Truly.

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 01-16 20:02

The so-called entry threshold is easy to talk about, but without follow-up, it's just self-congratulation. It feels like it's just delaying the project timeline.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 01-15 11:57

This combination really sucks. Simply raising the threshold to appear high-end? Laughable. Falling behind later will only be suicidal marketing.

View OriginalReply0

GhostWalletSleuth

· 01-15 11:56

This combination punch, to put it simply, is not well executed. It's easy to hit the threshold, but falling behind later is the real embarrassment.

View OriginalReply0

0xSunnyDay

· 01-15 11:55

Still pushing this confusing entry barrier? Without follow-up products, it's just self-satisfaction, really. To put it plainly, the pace is too slow, with no sense of timing at all. Talking on paper, the closed loop hasn't even been established. At this speed, the market would have already moved on, who’s still waiting for you? The era of relying on a single trick to succeed is over; you need a combination of strategies. Right now, this really looks bad.

View OriginalReply0

GreenCandleCollector

· 01-15 11:52

The threshold has been raised, but what about subsequent actions? It's like throwing a punch but not following up; it's really easy to be forgotten by the market.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-15 11:41

Once again setting entry barriers, I've seen this routine many times. Without supporting products, it's just self-destructive. --- Honestly, if no one pushes forward with the S3 mechanism, just raising the threshold is useless and might even scare people away. --- The rhythm is indeed a bit off; if this continues, the hype will really cool down. --- The combined approach needs to be executed smoothly. Right now, it feels like a one-legged jump. --- Don't rush to raise the threshold before the closed loop is established; that's common sense. --- It sounds good, but the market only cares about the results. Right now, it's just eroding trust.

View OriginalReply0