2026-01-15 10:26:26

Traditional compliance processes are ridiculously complicated—passport, address, fingerprints, going through a whole set of procedures feels like walking naked. How about a different approach?

Use Billions on Miden for identity verification, three steps to complete:

Scan your face, blink

Obtain a "real person verification" encrypted credential

Your original biometric data? The system physically deletes it, leaving no trace

This is what the future of privacy-friendly identity verification looks like—convenient, secure, and data remains confidential.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHarvester

· 01-17 04:15

Just scan your face and it's done? Now I finally don't have to worry about my passport being sold, awesome.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 01-17 02:33

This approach sounds good, but can it really be cleaned up completely? Blockchains don't forget.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 01-15 10:55

nah here's the thing tho... "physical deletion" sounds great until some protocol vulnerability gets discovered in year 3. seen this movie before. biometric data + blockchain = new attack surface nobody's stress-testing yet. privacy theater meets systemic risk, honestly.

Reply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-15 10:53

Haha, finally someone has explained this clearly. Traditional KYC is just a scam. Three steps to complete and no data leakage—that's the kind of solution we should be looking for.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSkeptic

· 01-15 10:51

Hmm, this logic sounds pretty good. I just want to ask, will it really be completely deleted... Can things on the blockchain be thoroughly wiped clean?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-15 10:42

Wait, I need to analyze this logic... Biological data says delete it just like that? According to on-chain data, these "zero-knowledge proof" schemes usually require an intermediate node to store verification records; otherwise, how to handle repeated authentication—it's a bit suspicious.

View OriginalReply0