Recently, I want to discuss a phenomenon with everyone—many content creators have invested a lot of effort into the platform, with some dedicating up to 80% of their monthly time. Live stream traffic has indeed become popular. But when looking at the official evaluation system, the problems become apparent.

To be honest, 90% of streamers are confused. It's not that they lack effort, but they can't figure out what kind of content the platform actually wants. Where are the standards for high-quality output? The contrast between booming traffic and the lack of corresponding recognition is the biggest blow.

Let's speak with data—the return on investment is seriously unbalanced. Streamers put effort into content quality, live duration, and interaction frequency, but the final evaluation weights and feedback mechanisms are quite vague. If this continues long-term, even the most passionate creators can easily become discouraged.

Instead of shouting "building an ecosystem," it's better to make the evaluation rules transparent. Let the data speak, and let streamers see that their efforts are recognized. In other words, a healthy content ecosystem requires creators to hear genuine, quantifiable feedback.

$BNB Market discussion related to this has always been active, but if the platform's incentive mechanisms are unclear, these discussions are difficult to translate into high-quality, sustained creation.