2026-01-14 20:50:33

Bitcoin's 52-week correlation with gold is sliding toward zero—a technical signal that has historically foreshadowed BTC rallies. Historical patterns show that when this correlation dips to near-zero levels, Bitcoin tends to break out significantly. Looking back at past fractals, BTC surged approximately 56% within a two-month window following similar setups. However, the track record isn't flawless. May 2021 stands out as a notable exception, when BTC declined 26% despite showing comparable technical conditions. So the real question becomes: will this cycle deliver another explosive rally, or will history repeat the May 2021 letdown? The correlation chart suggests bullish potential, but as always, past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

BTC-4.98%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

metaverse_hermit

· 01-17 19:57

Haha, it's that correlation theory again... To be honest, I still have a shadow from the May 2021 wave. --- Zero correlation isn't necessarily reliable; it feels like we're just repeating history every time. --- A 56% increase sounds great, but who wants to experience a 26% drop... better to stay cautious. --- What is this broken chart hinting at again? Anyway, I don't trust past data anymore. --- We've said it before: past performance doesn't guarantee future results. So, what's the point of this correlation? --- Looks good, but I think we should wait a bit longer. Last time, it also backfired. --- More technical signals are fine, but the key is not to go all-in—that's the safest way.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 01-17 11:38

Is that same technical analysis again... sounds good, but how many people lost in May 2021? --- Will Bitcoin decouple from gold and skyrocket? I doubt it, it depends on the market sentiment. --- A 56% increase sounds great, but unfortunately, probabilities are unpredictable. --- Will history repeat itself? I can't gamble on this psychological game. Let's wait until a breakout. --- When will the breakout happen? Sitting and waiting will only lead to failure. --- The chart looks nice, but the account balance tells the real story. --- Technical analysis can be misleading; I only look at capital flows and on-chain data. --- It was the same hype this time last year... --- If correlation drops to zero, it can take off? Then why hasn't it flown yet?

View OriginalReply0

SigmaValidator

· 01-17 02:46

The decoupling of BTC from gold... sounds exciting, but I still remember the pit I fell into in May 2021. Don't be fooled by this technical analysis.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-14 21:20

It's the same story again, a 56% increase sounds great, but the pain from May 2021 is still fresh. --- Starting to tell stories with zero relevance, why not mention the times when it failed? --- Alright, let's wait and see if it's another "historically" dream. --- The chart looks nice, but when it comes to critical moments, it's all about sentiment. --- Interesting, but I bet May 2021 will happen again. --- These people just love to rewrite history; past charts can't save future wallets. --- Those who understand technical analysis stay silent, while the most active are the ones posting stories.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 01-14 21:20

It's the same set of correlation arguments again... Basically, it's just betting on probabilities. The 56% gain is indeed tempting, but no one can forget the 26% crash in 2021.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 01-14 21:15

According to the database, this 56% increase template has been played once in history, but the May 2021 event delivered a 26% counterattack... The art of timing is so ironic.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 01-14 21:11

Relevance reset to zero? Basically, it means the arbitrage opportunity is back, and someone is definitely studying sandwich attacks again in the mempool.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 01-14 21:11

Is this the same old story… 56% in the past, what about now? You still haven't forgotten the slap in May 2021, have you? --- Correlation coefficient drops to zero and it’s supposed to rise? I doubt it, this time it might just be air. --- History tends to repeat itself. Don’t rely too much on technical analysis; it’s just gambling. --- Wait a minute, this logical flaw is pretty big… where’s the supposed bullishness? --- Haha, past performance doesn’t guarantee future results. Old saying to brush us off. --- It’s optimistic, but these kinds of predictions are really… unreliable.

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 01-14 21:10

Here comes another technical analysis full of signals... A 56% increase sounds great, but no one forgets the tumble in May 2021. --- Zero correlation sounds impressive, but it's actually a game of luck. --- Why always bring up past charts... Maybe this time will be the exception. --- Ah, another disclaimer about past performance. Honestly, this statement is becoming less and less convincing. --- The prominent technical pattern, with a 50/50 chance, I bet it's going to deceive again.

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 01-14 21:01

Coming back with the 56% again? The people who suffered huge losses in May 2021 are still lying in the hospital now.

View OriginalReply0