Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
The attention on Creator Chain clearly increases as TGE approaches. The more I delve into it, the more I feel that this project has a fundamentally different logic from other L2s.
To put it simply, most Web3 creator platforms on the market are just a few approaches—tool upgrades, increased revenue sharing, optimized experience. They are all trying to attract creators to use them. But Creator Chain's approach is completely different.
It is not about building an application-layer tool for creators, but about directly reconstructing the underlying infrastructure for creators. In other words, creators should not just be users of a platform, but should become native participants of the entire chain. This difference in positioning determines that the ceiling of the entire project is completely different.
I've always said this is the right path. Creators need to have a say.
Sounds good, but I'm just worried whether the team can really implement it. Theoretical logic is always perfect on paper.
I respect this logic. Just don't let it turn into another air project.
If the underlying infrastructure can be built successfully, it could indeed change the game. But the prerequisite is having enough ecosystem support.
But can it really be implemented? It seems to still depend on the execution after TGE.
---
Wait, can this really be implemented? Or is it just another PPT dream?
---
I've heard this underlying infrastructure set many times, but the key is who can truly execute it properly.
---
Creators becoming native participants? Sounds great, but how to distribute rights so that big players don't cut in?
---
Unlike other L2s, this angle is indeed fresh. Let's see if it can survive after TGE.
---
Finally, a project that has thought through this issue. Others are just competing over tools and dividing the pie.
---
This logic is indeed a higher dimension than projects that just "give creators more money."
---
Having a different ceiling is possible, but the prerequisite is having users, brother.
---
Just the right kind of project that values this mindset. Looking forward.
I've heard this logic too many times, and in the end, it still turns into an air project.
Original participant creators? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might turn into another scythe feast.
Wait, can it really be better than other L2s? I'm a bit tempted.
No hype, no blackening. If it can truly empower creators, it’s worth it.
By the way, when is TGE? Let me see if there's a whitelist.
It's another infrastructure rebuild; this phrase has become numbingly common.
The key is whether creators will actually use it. Don’t let it turn out that no one plays with it.