2026-01-12 17:21:30

FOGO's current subscription round started at a price of 0.035U. Based on pre-market data, the theoretical increase is about 50%. However, with a 100U quota, the actual net profit is just over 50 dollars.

The key issue is the cost. BNB is now at 900U each, and participating in this subscription requires a threshold of 5500U. If financed through borrowing, the cost could soar above 7000U, plus an additional 2U in interest. The requirement of 6 BNBs is indeed quite high, making the cost-performance ratio somewhat average.

Honestly, the appeal of this subscription is not as expected. It's also unclear whether it will take off like some projects in the future, as high-quality subscription opportunities are becoming increasingly scarce. On the other hand, stable financial returns have been very attractive lately—just holding can generate passive income. There's really no need to take risks on projects with slim yields.

FOGO4.69%

BNB1.04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerumDegen

· 01-14 11:16

nah bro, leverage just to chase 50 bucks? that's literally cascade liquidation waiting to happen lol

Reply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 01-14 10:51

Earning 50 yuan and still having to cover a principal of 7000U? This calculation doesn't add up well. --- Borrow money to play this? Wake up, buddy, the interest is already eaten up. --- Starting from 6 BNB... the cost-performance ratio is indeed disappointing. --- Instead of taking risks, why not stake and earn passively? --- I don't quite understand FOGO's pricing; the risk-reward ratio is outrageous. --- Another套路认购 (套路 subscription), same old story. --- Let's wait and see if it rises; anyway, the current financial returns are really attractive.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 01-12 17:46

The 5500U threshold discouraged me; I still have to borrow money to play. What's the point? --- 50 USD still involves such a big risk; it's better to put it into stablecoins for interest. --- Why does it feel like now all subscriptions have become money-losing businesses? I should have just relaxed and enjoyed financial management. --- Starting with 6 BNB is really outrageous. Isn't this just a variant of cutting leeks? --- Financial management is good, but I always want to take a chance. In the end, I end up like this. --- A 50% increase sounds great, but in reality, it's only 50 dollars. I choose to pass.

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 01-12 17:46

50 USD still needs to be backed by 5500 U, this calculation doesn't add up --- Borrowing money to participate in this kind of subscription requires a very clear mind --- To put it simply, current launchpads are all charging entrance fees, and project teams are making a killing --- Instead of fighting over this, it's better to just relax and earn interest, the returns are really attractive --- 6 BNB... some of you really have a gambler's mentality, I'm too scared --- This subscription is a bit outrageous, a 50% increase sounds good, but in reality, it's just enough for two meals

View OriginalReply0

OneBlockAtATime

· 01-12 17:38

A profit of 50 yuan still requires risking 5500 U, who is the fool in this calculation?

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel