#治理投票 Seeing the news about WLFI launching governance voting, I want to share some thoughts with everyone.

This type of proposal voting is actually a good window to assess a project's maturity. How the treasury funds are utilized, and how incentive measures are designed—these decisions directly impact the long-term value trajectory. The key is to look at community participation and the rationality of decision-making, rather than being blinded by short-term positive stimuli.

I often remind those around me that when participating in governance voting, you should think through a few questions: Is it reasonable to use these funds to accelerate applications? Does the adoption of USD1 truly support the entire ecosystem? Will the incentive measures create short-term bubbles? These considerations can help us avoid blindly following the trend.

If you hold related assets, instead of just watching the price go up or down, it’s better to spend time understanding the project’s direction. Good governance votes often indicate that the project team is willing to involve the community in decision-making, which is itself a relatively healthy signal. But the premise is that you need to do your homework, rather than just follow others’ votes.

The logic of long-term holding needs constant validation. Ensuring position safety and maintaining a steady mindset—getting these basics right means even market fluctuations won’t throw you off course.