Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
On-chain monitoring has detected a noteworthy trend—five long-dormant BTC wallets, inactive for 13 years, have collectively been activated, transferring nearly 50,000 BTC in the short term, with a total value exceeding $2 billion. The last transactions in these wallets date back to 2013, with coins costing only a few dollars, and now the paper gains are in the ten-thousand-fold range.
What does this large-scale movement really signify? Let’s look at some reference cases to get a clearer picture. In July 2025, a whale that had been dormant for 14 years transferred out 80,000 BTC (worth $9 billion). The market was indeed tense for a while, but ultimately Galaxy Digital facilitated an OTC block trade directly with institutional investors like BlackRock, quietly completing the transaction, and Bitcoin continued to rise. Looking further back to 2024, early wallets dormant for 15 years were activated, but they only moved coins from one cold wallet to another, without touching exchanges—purely for risk diversification.
This time’s situation is somewhat unusual—five wallets were operated simultaneously, and coins from 49 scattered addresses were consolidated into one, which is quite uncommon. How to interpret the true intent? Consider three signals: transfers to exchanges and split into small transactions, often a prelude to dumping; transfers to new cold wallets while maintaining large transfers, mostly just relocating storage; and backing by institutional OTC support, which generally alleviates concerns.
The current background conditions are also worth noting—ETFs have absorbed $59.9 billion in funds, and BlackRock alone can handle the scale of 3,000 BTC in a single day. The institutional backing capacity is indeed different. The key question remains: is this $2 billion transfer by the old players a sign of them offloading, or are institutions secretly positioning?